Kaydedildi:
| Yazar: | |
|---|---|
| Materyal Türü: | Recurso digital |
| Dil: | İngilizce |
| Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi: |
Zenodo
2026
|
| Konular: | |
| Online Erişim: | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20089248 |
| Etiketler: |
Etiketle
Etiket eklenmemiş, İlk siz ekleyin!
|
İçindekiler:
- <p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">The popular explanation of Hawking radiation — in which virtual particle pairs are born near the event horizon, the horizon tears them apart, one particle falls in with negative energy and the other escapes — has become the canonical image of black hole physics since Hawking's "A Brief History of Time" (1988). This paper subjects that picture to systematic quantitative and conceptual scrutiny using Sagittarius A* as a concrete test case.</p> <p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">We present four quantitative checks and a thought experiment with three observers that together expose fundamental failures of the popular picture: (1) the predicted radiation composition contradicts the thermal spectrum — electron-positron pairs cannot be produced at temperatures 24 orders of magnitude below the pair-creation threshold; (2) the naive count of virtual particles in a Planck-thickness shell near the horizon (~10⁸⁹) implies radiation power exceeding the luminosity of the observable Universe by 46 orders of magnitude, while the actual Hawking luminosity is ~10⁻⁴² W; (3) the characteristic wavelength of emitted photons (~79 Schwarzschild radii ≈ 6.3 AU for Sgr A*) precludes localization of any "pair" at the horizon; (4) no physical mechanism determines which particle escapes, and classical mechanics in such a gravitational field predicts capture of both particles with zero net mass change.</p> <p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">A Gedankenexperiment with three observers — distant, freely falling, and hovering — yields three independent contradictions: a 137-order-of-magnitude power discrepancy, violation of the equivalence principle (experimentally verified to 10⁻¹⁵), and attribution of radiation to the horizon rather than to the observer's acceleration (Unruh effect).</p> <p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">We further show that any real black hole in the present Universe absorbs cosmic microwave background radiation at a rate exceeding its Hawking emission by 58 orders of magnitude, rendering "evaporation" astrophysically meaningless for the foreseeable cosmic future.</p> <p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">Hawking's original 1975 calculation via Bogoliubov transformations — which contains no virtual pairs and no local process at the horizon — remains unchallenged. What fails is the popularized ontology grafted onto it thirteen years later. This is the second in a series of articles demonstrating that literal interpretation of virtual particles as physical entities produces contradictions across quantum physics — from the Casimir effect to black hole radiation to the cosmological constant problem.</p>