Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Recurso digital |
| Sprog: | engelsk |
| Udgivet: |
Zenodo
2026
|
| Fag: | |
| Online adgang: | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20091485 |
| Tags: |
Tilføj Tag
Ingen Tags, Vær først til at tagge denne postø!
|
Indholdsfortegnelse:
- <p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">This article introduces and develops the hypothesis that the rate of behavioural code-switching, the pace at which shared norms behaviours, dress, language and expectations shift within a given space, constitutes an independent and hitherto neglected variable in Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) analysis.</p> <p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">Across all three generations of CPTED, the framework has engaged with cultural diversity as a condition to be assessed at the time of intervention. What has remained unaddressed is cultural difference as a dynamic: the rate at which the normative landscape of a space changes over time, and the consequences of that rate of change for the social mechanisms on which CPTED depends.</p> <p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">The article characterises the rate of behavioural code-switching along three interrelated dimensions: the velocity of normative change, the multiplicity of concurrent codes, and the degree of incompatibility between them. Drawing on cross-cultural code-switching theory, social acceleration theory, and empirical research on neighbourhood change and cultural dynamics, two potential outcomes of high rates of normative change are distinguished: cultural stabilisation through pluralistic normalisation, and social fragmentation through normative erosion. Each carries fundamentally different implications for CPTED effectiveness.</p> <p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">The article argues for incorporating temporal dynamics into CPTED assessment and design, identifies interface zones — boundaries between areas governed by different normative rhythms — as priority sites for reassessment, and discusses the implications of the two-feedback-loop limitation axiom for participatory approaches in rapidly changing normative environments. It invites further empirical research into measurement methods, threshold values, and practical application.</p> <p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">Published as a preprint prior to submission to and peer review by the International CPTED Association Journal.</p>