Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Recurso digital |
| Lenguaje: | inglés |
| Publicado: |
Zenodo
2026
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20109979 |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| _version_ | 1866901852130377728 |
|---|---|
| author | Osmolovskyi, Kostiantyn |
| author_facet | Osmolovskyi, Kostiantyn |
| contents | <p>This technical report clarifies the architectural conditions under which coherence representation acquires affect-like organization within cognitive regulation.</p> <p>Building on earlier work in the series, the paper starts from three established results: coherence representation functions as a compressed regulatorily available signal under restricted accessibility, manifestation exceeds current enacted processing, and coherence-related manifestation may already be directionally organized in terms of worsening, maintained stability, and movement toward reduced pressure. On this basis, the report argues that no additional affect-variable or separate affect-domain is required. Instead, the already established coherence representation may acquire a more specific role when it functions as a compressed, rapidly accessible, integrative, and regulatorily weighted significance of state and directionality relative to ongoing stability conditions.</p> <p>To make this role minimally explicit, the report introduces a compact formal insert in which the current state is treated as a modifiable structural configuration, projected configurations are evaluated relative to the invariant-induced stability region, and directional significance is expressed through change in coherence distance. Using this framework, the paper develops burden-like, relief-like, threat-like, and attraction-like organization as differentiated role-forms of the same coherence representation. It further argues that affect-like organization is not confined to enacted processing, but may arise across inner manifestation, including projected and presently non-admitted configurations.</p> <p>The report remains deliberately bounded. It does not formalize explicit feeling, qualia, outward expression, or inter-system readability. Its contribution is a strict architectural clarification of how coherence representation acquires affect-like organization across inner manifestation, thereby strengthening the bridge between coherence representation, directional significance, and metaregulation without multiplying the ontology of the theory.</p> |
| format | Recurso digital |
| id | zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_20109979 |
| institution | Zenodo |
| language | eng |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| publisher | Zenodo |
| record_format | zenodo |
| spellingShingle | Architectural Conditions under which Coherence Representation Acquires Affect-like Organization Osmolovskyi, Kostiantyn (MeSH) Cognitive Science (EuroSciVoc) Artificial intelligence coherence representation affect-like organization compressed regulatory accessibility inner manifestation directional significance burden-like organization relief-like organization threat-like organization <p>This technical report clarifies the architectural conditions under which coherence representation acquires affect-like organization within cognitive regulation.</p> <p>Building on earlier work in the series, the paper starts from three established results: coherence representation functions as a compressed regulatorily available signal under restricted accessibility, manifestation exceeds current enacted processing, and coherence-related manifestation may already be directionally organized in terms of worsening, maintained stability, and movement toward reduced pressure. On this basis, the report argues that no additional affect-variable or separate affect-domain is required. Instead, the already established coherence representation may acquire a more specific role when it functions as a compressed, rapidly accessible, integrative, and regulatorily weighted significance of state and directionality relative to ongoing stability conditions.</p> <p>To make this role minimally explicit, the report introduces a compact formal insert in which the current state is treated as a modifiable structural configuration, projected configurations are evaluated relative to the invariant-induced stability region, and directional significance is expressed through change in coherence distance. Using this framework, the paper develops burden-like, relief-like, threat-like, and attraction-like organization as differentiated role-forms of the same coherence representation. It further argues that affect-like organization is not confined to enacted processing, but may arise across inner manifestation, including projected and presently non-admitted configurations.</p> <p>The report remains deliberately bounded. It does not formalize explicit feeling, qualia, outward expression, or inter-system readability. Its contribution is a strict architectural clarification of how coherence representation acquires affect-like organization across inner manifestation, thereby strengthening the bridge between coherence representation, directional significance, and metaregulation without multiplying the ontology of the theory.</p> |
| title | Architectural Conditions under which Coherence Representation Acquires Affect-like Organization |
| topic | (MeSH) Cognitive Science (EuroSciVoc) Artificial intelligence coherence representation affect-like organization compressed regulatory accessibility inner manifestation directional significance burden-like organization relief-like organization threat-like organization |
| url | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20109979 |