Αποθηκεύτηκε σε:
| Κύριος συγγραφέας: | |
|---|---|
| Μορφή: | Recurso digital |
| Γλώσσα: | |
| Έκδοση: |
Zenodo
2026
|
| Θέματα: | |
| Διαθέσιμο Online: | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20129515 |
| Ετικέτες: |
Προσθήκη ετικέτας
Δεν υπάρχουν, Καταχωρήστε ετικέτα πρώτοι!
|
Πίνακας περιεχομένων:
- <p>The preceding papers in this series examined structural conditions under which AI-assisted organizational systems may alter the relationship between coordination cost, participatory variability, tacit coordination, temporal continuity, and navigational capacity. Each paper identified a structural condition that industrial organizations had historically imposed — and examined how AI-assisted systems may alter it. The present paper examines a structural condition that underlies all of these: the emergence of organizational fields that cannot be fully explained through individual ability, procedural control, or explicit organizational design.</p> <p> </p> <p>Certain organizational systems maintain continuity, directional coherence, participatory aspiration, and recognizable identity despite continuous personnel turnover, leadership succession, stylistic transformation, and incomplete procedural standardization. The paper proposes that such continuity may emerge not solely through formal organizational structures, but through participatory fields: distributed environments of orientation, aspiration, tacit coordination, symbolic continuity, and situated organizational inhabitation that persist beyond individual control.</p> <p> </p> <p>The paper proposes three structural concepts. The first is the participatory field itself: a distributed organizational condition in which orientation, aspiration, tacit expectations, and directional sensing become partially stabilized across time without requiring full procedural codification. The second is participation aspiration: the sustained desire to enter, remain within, or remain symbolically connected to an organizational field — a condition in which organizational participation becomes identity-forming rather than purely transactional. The third is field amplification: a condition in which participation within a strong organizational field enables capacities that exceed what participants consistently produce in isolation.</p> <p> </p> <p>The paper offers a structural observation: certain forms of organizational continuity may depend less on procedural replication and individual control than on the structural conditions under which participatory fields can form, persist, and remain adaptive across time. Procedural mechanisms do not become irrelevant. They operate alongside a different form of organizational persistence that requires a different structural description.</p> <p> </p> <p>This paper constitutes Part V of the “Participatory Organizations in the AI Era” series.</p> <p> </p>