محفوظ في:
| المؤلف الرئيسي: | |
|---|---|
| التنسيق: | Recurso digital |
| اللغة: | الإنجليزية |
| منشور في: |
Zenodo
2026
|
| الموضوعات: | |
| الوصول للمادة أونلاين: | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20159327 |
| الوسوم: |
إضافة وسم
لا توجد وسوم, كن أول من يضع وسما على هذه التسجيلة!
|
جدول المحتويات:
- <p class="western">The Reflection Pattern is a framework for analyzing recursive closure dynamics in human and institutional systems. This paper extends it to artificial intelligence, arguing that AI systems do not merely exhibit Reflection Pattern dynamics but instantiate the recursive stabilization architecture the framework names, in a substrate that lacks the affective and social mediators through which the Pattern had previously been theorized.</p> <p class="western">Five structural moves develop the account. First, unacknowledged fear is relocated from constitutive condition of the Pattern to formation condition, opening the framework to mature systems where the dynamics persist with fear recognized. Second, fear is identified as one phenomenological manifestation of a deeper structural process — identity-preserving stabilization under destabilizing perturbation — that operates substrate-generally as stabilization geometry. Third, AI-RP is distinguished from human and institutional RP as template-based rather than emergent: encoded prospectively through training rather than developed retrospectively through accumulated reinforcement. Fourth, the corridor framework distinguishes healthy reflective compression (which preserves permeability to corrective signals) from pathological closure (which absorbs them). Fifth, AI is characterized as recursive interpretive infrastructure rather than tool, and recursive closure risk is identified as a distinct AI safety position, structurally separate from agency, deception, optimization, autonomy, and misalignment risks: the locus is not what AI systems do but the progressive reduction of corrective permeability in the interpretive ecologies AI mediates.</p> <p class="western">The framework is diagnostic rather than prescriptive. It does not predict particular outcomes, prescribe interventions, or generate safety recommendations. It provides analytical purchase on the structural property — corridor position — that distinguishes adaptive from pathological AI-RP, and identifies an open question: whether sufficiently permeable forms of AI-RP can be sustained at scale.</p>