Πίνακας περιεχομένων:

Αποθηκεύτηκε σε:

Λεπτομέρειες βιβλιογραφικής εγγραφής
Κύριος συγγραφέας:	IJMSRT
Μορφή:	Recurso digital
Γλώσσα:
Έκδοση:	Zenodo 2026
Διαθέσιμο Online:	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20195070
Ετικέτες:	Προσθήκη ετικέτας Δεν υπάρχουν, Καταχωρήστε ετικέτα πρώτοι!

Πίνακας περιεχομένων:

Abstract  One of the laws is the Doctrine of Adverse  Possession which allows a person staying  in possession of a piece of land that  belongs to a different individual to acquire  the title. This doctrine is mostly regulated  in India with the help of the Limitation Act  of 1963. According to this Act, 12 years  possession of the immovable property is a  time frame on which one can initiate a suit  concerning the private land and 30 years  concerning the government land. This  doctrine is based on the idea that a failure  of a landowner to claim his or her rights to  his or her property after some time should  make it cede its rights to the person who  has been running and sustaining the land.  Under adverse possession, when an  individual can prove that he or she has  occupied a piece of land openly, in  defiance, and against authorization over  the time that they require them to be so  occupied, then they may prove their legal  title. The doctrine has brought in a great  deal of debate and controversy in India.  Critics feel that it is unfair and  retrogressive and favors intruders and  punishes the rightful landholders. It has a  practical application according to its  advocates, as land is put to productive use,  and one way of overcoming the long standing land disputes. The historical  background of the adverse possession, the  legal basis of adverse possession in India,  and the most prominent court cases that  affected the interpretation of adverse  possession would also be discussed in this  paper. It will also look at the existing  problems and controversies of this  doctrine and how it impacts the property  rights in India.

Παρόμοια τεκμήρια