Sisdoallologahallan: :: Library Catalog

Furkejuvvon:

Bibliográfalaš dieđut
Váldodahkki:	Santoyo Ortiz, Armando
Materiálatiipa:	Recurso digital
Giella:
Almmustuhtton:	Zenodo 2026
Fáttát:	proto-consciousness, self-model, C index, reflexive integration, amplification hypothesis, dynamic synchrony, prisoner's dilemma, abstraction hierarchy, integrated information, MINE estimator, critical phase transition, learning-action coupling, PROSENTIR
Liŋkkat:	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20265133
Fáddágilkorat:	Lasit fáddágilkoriid Eai fáddágilkorat, Lasit vuosttaš fáddágilkora!

Sisdoallologahallan:

We present PROSENTIR Phase 4, introducing the self-model as the central architectural innovation and the C index as the first operational measure of proto-consciousness in the PROSENTIR framework (Phase 1: 10.5281/zenodo.19912924; Phase 2: 10.5281/zenodo.20019260; Phase 3: 10.5281/zenodo.20090917). The self-model S = [M3_norm, tau_norm, Phi_norm] implements reflexive information integration: the agent monitors its own global state, temporal persistence, and inter-module integration in real time, feeding this self-perception back into its Level-3 global integrator with dominant weight w_S = 0.45. The C index (version 1.0) is defined as:   C = 0.45·S + 0.25·Phi + 0.15·tau + 0.15·A with weights fixed a priori and explicitly justified as provisional. A pre-registered comparative experiment (N=60 pairs CON self-model vs N=60 SIN) finds the primary hypothesis not confirmed (CON=0.352 vs SIN=0.359, p=0.747). The principal finding — the Amplification Hypothesis — is that the self-model does not raise mean cooperation but substantially amplifies the system's capacity for extreme states: 5 CON pairs exceed 0.60 cooperation vs. 0 SIN pairs (post-hoc descriptive); the CON maximum (0.831) far exceeds the SIN maximum (0.482). Retrospective analysis of the 5 successful pairs reveals that 4 of 5 exhibit early M3 synchrony (self-model stabilizes pre-existing alignment); one pair shows genuinely emergent synchrony (seed 1778480933, r_late=0.581 > r_early=0.518, |M3_A-M3_B| decreasing 0.1015→0.0756). Individual simulation analysis reveals three dynamical regimes: when dynamic synchrony is present, C correlates strongly with cooperation (r up to 0.759); when absent, C provides no predictive power. The C index is robust (mean≈0.55, SD≈0.04) but insensitive to the self-model as a specific intervention, motivating empirical weight optimization in Phase 5. Phase 5 is specified as: (1) Learning-Action coupling L via explicit predictor submodule P generating M3_pred(t+1)=W_P·S(t); (2) empirical weight optimization via gradient descent on r(C, mutual_cooperation); (3) formal mapping of PROSENTIR signatures to the 3D-MIND hybrid biological-electronic system (Princeton, 2026, Nature Nanotechnology). Reproducible code: prosentir_v13.py (included).

Geahča maid