Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Recurso digital |
| Sprache: | |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Zenodo
2026
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20393530 |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Inhaltsangabe:
- <p>This working paper develops the FEIK Semantic Accountability Framework as an applied extension of FEIK Protocol v4.2: Semantic Security. The framework synthesizes two FEIK/Shitfilter applications: Interface-Orwell Decryption and the Corruption-Shitfilter. It examines how language-mediated systems can hide power, favoritism, responsibility gaps, criteria laundering, weak appeal paths, and agency compression inside acceptable institutional, technical, strategic, or user-friendly language.</p> <p>The framework does not begin by accusing actors of intentional wrongdoing. It asks a narrower operational question: where does the structure stop being inspectable? The paper proposes a mechanism stack including Silence Log, Register Lock, Responsibility Chain Reconstruction, Phi-gate operationalization, Semantic Encryption/Decryption, Criteria Timeline Audit, Benefit Mapping, Conflict-of-Interest Expansion, Criteria Laundering Detector, Answer Extraction Test, Appeal Path Audit, Co-option Trap, and Self-Application Clause.</p> <p>The result is not a truth machine, but a semantic pressure tool: a method for reconstructing the missing chain between language, criteria, timeline, benefit, responsibility, agency, and appeal. A system becomes accountable when its decision path can be reconstructed by someone affected by it.</p>