محفوظ في:
| المؤلفون الرئيسيون: | , |
|---|---|
| التنسيق: | Recurso digital |
| اللغة: | |
| منشور في: |
Zenodo
2021
|
| الموضوعات: | |
| الوصول للمادة أونلاين: | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4448202 |
| الوسوم: |
إضافة وسم
لا توجد وسوم, كن أول من يضع وسما على هذه التسجيلة!
|
جدول المحتويات:
- <p><b><i>Opacuincola gretathunbergae</i> sp. nov.</b></p><p>urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: FCAB414F-A55A-4819-AFE1-CE2AF78D6B2F</p><p>Figs 4 E–F, 5 D–E, 6 D, 8 C, 11 B, 12; Tables 1–2</p><p><b>Diagnosis</b></p><p>The new species is most similar to <i>Op. ngatapuna</i> in terms of shape and epidermal pigmentation. It differs from the latter in 11 diagnostic DNA positions, in being much larger and in penial morphology. The penis and penial lobe of <i>Op. gretathunbergae</i> sp. nov. are considerably more delicate.</p><p><b>Etymology</b></p><p>The dedicatee of this new species is the Swedish teenage climate activist Greta Thunberg. Starting with a single-person school strike and demonstration to save our climate she has sparked the global movement “Fridays for Future” supported primarily by young people and managed to finally get momentum in global politics toward action against climate change after warnings of scientists have been largely ignored for more than 30 years. We wish her and the movement the endurance necessary to keep the pressure up!</p><p><b>Material examined</b></p><p><b>Holotype</b> (Fig. 4E) NEW ZEALAND • Kahurangi National Park, W of Motueka, Cobb Dam Road; 41°04ʹ25.0ʺ S, 172°45ʹ18.5ʺ E; 1 Mar. 2016; G. Verhaegen and M. Haase leg.; on leaves, stones, woody debris in trickle along road; NMNZ.M.330191.</p><p><b>Paratypes</b> (Figs. 4F; 5 D–E) NEW ZEALAND • 21 specs; same collection data as for holotype; NMNZ.M.330192.</p><p><b>Description</b></p><p>SHELL (Figs 4 E–F, 5D–E). Blunt-conical to pupiform, about 1.65 times as high as than wide, whitetranslucent with brown periostracum; protoconch almost smooth with fine pits comprising ca 0.75 whorl (Fig. 6D); entire shell with 3.5 to 4.25 whorls, teleoconch initially with fine longitudinal ridges, then without structure apart from growth lines; umbilicus narrow; aperture orthocline, slightly higher than wide.</p><p>OPERCULUM. Orange, paucispiral; nucleus submarginal, without peg.</p><p>EXTERNAL FEATURES (Figs 4 E–F). Epidermis with irregular, large pigment blotches; eyes well developed and entirely pigmented; tentacles without particular ciliation.</p><p>MANTLE CAVITY (n = 3). 10–12 ctenidial filaments; osphradium ovate-elongate, behind middle of gill.</p><p>DIGESTIVE SYSTEM. Radula has formula R 5-6 1 5–6/3–4 3–4, L 5–6 1 6, M1 22–26, M2 31–32 (Fig. 8C); stomach without caecum; rectal loop pointing left in roof of mantle cavity, in males more distinct than in females.</p><p>FEMALE GENITALIA (n = 2; Fig. 12). Ovary small, simple sac starting> 1.5 whorls below apex, comprising 0.25 whorl and not reaching stomach; renal oviduct first coiling 180° clockwise, then 270° counterclockwise; one distal, large receptaculum seminis lying against anterior area of bursa copulatrix; bursa copulatrix large, globular, extending behind much smaller albumen gland, bursal duct entering anteriorly; ovoviviparous, brooding at least three embryos in pallial oviduct, pallial oviduct as brood pouch with very short albumen gland and large capsule gland, the latter histologically uniform in CT scans.</p><p>MALE GENITALIA (n = 4). Testis lobate sac, starting ca 0.75 whorl below apex, comprising up to 1 whorl, may reach stomach; vesicula seminalis coils along anterior half of testis; proximal vas deferens inserts close to middle of kidney-shaped prostate, distal vas deferens leaving anteriorly; penis long, slender, continuously tapering, pointed; distinct lobe on right side pointing forward (Fig. 11B).</p><p><b>Remarks</b></p><p>The sister relationship of <i>Op. gretathunbergae</i> sp. nov. to <i>Op. ngatapuna</i> was fairly well supported (Fig. 2). The average COI p-distance was 0.014 and there were eight type 1 characters in COI and three in 16S (Table 2). Morphologically, the new species is larger. Univariate tests comparing shell dimensions could not be conducted, though, because of the small sample size available for <i>Op. ngatapuna</i>. But the PCA (Fig. 3) and the data in Haase (2008) are clear regarding the size difference. Anatomically, only the male genitalia could be compared because this information is lacking for <i>Op. ngatapuna</i> (Haase 2008). The well-developed eyes indicate that the new species is a true crenobiont.</p>