Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Recurso digital |
| Language: | |
| Published: |
Zenodo
2022
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7873421 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Table of Contents:
- <p>[727] <i>Lecythis praeclara</i> (Sandwith) S.A.Mori ex Molino & Sabatier, comb. nov.</p><p><i>Eschweilera praeclara</i> Sandwith, <i>Bull. Misc. Inform. Kew</i> 1935 (3): 127 [20 May 1935] (Sandwith 1935).</p><p>NOTES. — Known only from the Guiana Shield. Mori & Prance (Mori <i>et al.</i> 1990: 313) hesitantly placed <i>Eschweilera praeclara</i> in synonymy under <i>L. holcogyne</i>, specifying that it has “flowers and fruits intermediate in size between <i>L. holcogyne</i> and <i>L. chartacea</i> ”. They further hypothesized that <i>E. praeclara</i> could be a hybrid between these two <i>Lecythis</i> species. Since then, Scott Mori has become convinced that it was indeed a distinct species, whether or not it was the result of hybridization, as proven by the determinavits “ <i>L. praeclara</i> (Sandwith) Mori ” that he affixed to several specimens, notably at CAY. More recently, he has personally and repeatedly reasserted this position to the first two authors of the present work, at the same time explaining his reluctance to publish this new combination because of the uncertainty of the generic limits of <i>Lecythis</i>, which has been shown by genetic studies to be polyphyletic (Mori <i>et al.</i> 2017). Even so, these studies have provided evidence that <i>E. praeclara</i>, as well as <i>E. congestiflora</i> and <i>E. simiorum</i> are distant from the core <i>Eschweilera</i>, and grouped together with several <i>Lecythis</i> species (including <i>L. holcogyne</i>) in a “Chartacea clade” (Mori <i>et al.</i> 2017). Furthermore, <i>L. praeclara</i> appeared distinct from <i>L. holcogyne</i> (Mori <i>et al.</i> 2017). We are therefore in the presence of a taxon whose valid name is still <i>E. praeclara</i> although it does not belong to this genus. Even if it is on a provisional basis (the provisional often lasts decades when it comes to botanical nomenclature), it seems to us necessary to remove this taxon from the genus <i>Eschweilera</i>, and this can only be done, for the time being, by a transfer into <i>Lecythis</i>.</p><p>VERNACULAR NAMES. — Pa: kwatri-seinõ.</p><p>HERBARIUM DATA (FG). — 22 collections at CAY. Sel. exs.: <i>S.A. Mori et al. 15701</i>.</p><p>INVENTORY DATA (FG). — 32 trees in 25 plots; Fmax <1 %; dbhinv = 72.3 cm.</p>