On first-order arithmetic truth

Fuente: arXiv
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Boyce, Stephen
Format: Preprint
Published: 2011
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866910209940652032
author Boyce, Stephen
author_facet Boyce, Stephen
contents The standard interpretation of first-order number theory (PA), according to the generally accepted view, associates well-defined set-theoretic entities with each and every well-formed formula of this system. But this implies that the class of PA theorems is semantically defined by a class sign of PA itself, (E x_2) Pf(x_2, x_1), in the following sense: with b' the PA numeral for the number b, (E x_2) Pf(x_2, b') is true under the standard interpretation if and only if b is the Godel number of a PA theorem. From this however it is easily established, by a modification of Godel's proof, that the class of PA theorems, and hence the standard interpretation of PA itself, is not well defined after all.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_1105_0321
institution arXiv
publishDate 2011
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle On first-order arithmetic truth
Boyce, Stephen
General Mathematics
03C62, 03B25, 03F40, 03F03
The standard interpretation of first-order number theory (PA), according to the generally accepted view, associates well-defined set-theoretic entities with each and every well-formed formula of this system. But this implies that the class of PA theorems is semantically defined by a class sign of PA itself, (E x_2) Pf(x_2, x_1), in the following sense: with b' the PA numeral for the number b, (E x_2) Pf(x_2, b') is true under the standard interpretation if and only if b is the Godel number of a PA theorem. From this however it is easily established, by a modification of Godel's proof, that the class of PA theorems, and hence the standard interpretation of PA itself, is not well defined after all.
title On first-order arithmetic truth
topic General Mathematics
03C62, 03B25, 03F40, 03F03
url https://arxiv.org/abs/1105.0321