Block-diagonal reduction of matrices over commutative rings I. (Decomposition of modules vs decomposition of their support)

Fuente: arXiv
Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Kerner, Dmitry, Vinnikov, Victor
Format: Preprint
Veröffentlicht: 2013
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
_version_ 1866918398587305984
author Kerner, Dmitry
Vinnikov, Victor
author_facet Kerner, Dmitry
Vinnikov, Victor
contents Consider rectangular matrices over a commutative ring R. Assume the ideal of maximal minors factorizes, I_m(A)=J_1*J_2. When is A left-right equivalent to a block-diagonal matrix? (When does the module/sheaf Coker(A) decompose as the corresponding direct sum?) If R is not an elementary divisor ring (i.e. not a close relative of a principal ideal ring) one needs additional assumptions on A. No necessary and sufficient criterion for such block-diagonal reduction is known. In this part we establish the following: * The persistence of (in)decomposability under the change of rings. For example, the passage to Noetherian/local/complete rings, the decomposability of A over a graded ring R vs the decomposability of Coker(A) locally at the points of Proj(R), the restriction to a subscheme in Spec(R). * The necessary and sufficient condition for decomposability of square matrices in the case: det(A)=f_1*f_2 is not a zero divisor and f_1,f_2 are co-prime. As an immediate application we give criteria of simultaneous (block-)diagonal reduction for tuples of matrices over a field, i.e. linear determinantal representations.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_1305_2256
institution arXiv
publishDate 2013
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Block-diagonal reduction of matrices over commutative rings I. (Decomposition of modules vs decomposition of their support)
Kerner, Dmitry
Vinnikov, Victor
Commutative Algebra
Algebraic Geometry
Consider rectangular matrices over a commutative ring R. Assume the ideal of maximal minors factorizes, I_m(A)=J_1*J_2. When is A left-right equivalent to a block-diagonal matrix? (When does the module/sheaf Coker(A) decompose as the corresponding direct sum?) If R is not an elementary divisor ring (i.e. not a close relative of a principal ideal ring) one needs additional assumptions on A. No necessary and sufficient criterion for such block-diagonal reduction is known. In this part we establish the following: * The persistence of (in)decomposability under the change of rings. For example, the passage to Noetherian/local/complete rings, the decomposability of A over a graded ring R vs the decomposability of Coker(A) locally at the points of Proj(R), the restriction to a subscheme in Spec(R). * The necessary and sufficient condition for decomposability of square matrices in the case: det(A)=f_1*f_2 is not a zero divisor and f_1,f_2 are co-prime. As an immediate application we give criteria of simultaneous (block-)diagonal reduction for tuples of matrices over a field, i.e. linear determinantal representations.
title Block-diagonal reduction of matrices over commutative rings I. (Decomposition of modules vs decomposition of their support)
topic Commutative Algebra
Algebraic Geometry
url https://arxiv.org/abs/1305.2256