Boolos' Hardest Logic Puzzle Ever can be solved in no less than three admissible questions: axiomatic framework and rigorous proof

Fuente: arXiv
Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Colomina-Almiñana, J. J., Stinga, P. R.
Formato: Preprint
Publicado: 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
_version_ 1866909789227843584
author Colomina-Almiñana, J. J.
Stinga, P. R.
author_facet Colomina-Almiñana, J. J.
Stinga, P. R.
contents A formal axiomatic mathematical framework for Boolos' Hardest Logic Puzzle Ever is presented and two theorems about its solvability are proved. By strictly following Boolos' instructions (in particular, the requirement that all gods are always obliged to answer), the novel concept of \textit{admissible questions} for the puzzle is introduced. It is then rigorously proved that Boolos' original puzzle can be solved, in an absolute deterministic way, in no less than three yes-no admissible questions. However, this does not mean that one could solve it in less than three admissible questions by just pure \emph{chance}. Hence, such probabilities are computed here as well.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_1804_05677
institution arXiv
publishDate 2018
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Boolos' Hardest Logic Puzzle Ever can be solved in no less than three admissible questions: axiomatic framework and rigorous proof
Colomina-Almiñana, J. J.
Stinga, P. R.
History and Overview
A formal axiomatic mathematical framework for Boolos' Hardest Logic Puzzle Ever is presented and two theorems about its solvability are proved. By strictly following Boolos' instructions (in particular, the requirement that all gods are always obliged to answer), the novel concept of \textit{admissible questions} for the puzzle is introduced. It is then rigorously proved that Boolos' original puzzle can be solved, in an absolute deterministic way, in no less than three yes-no admissible questions. However, this does not mean that one could solve it in less than three admissible questions by just pure \emph{chance}. Hence, such probabilities are computed here as well.
title Boolos' Hardest Logic Puzzle Ever can be solved in no less than three admissible questions: axiomatic framework and rigorous proof
topic History and Overview
url https://arxiv.org/abs/1804.05677