Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2018
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://arxiv.org/abs/1812.11571 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866915144839200768 |
|---|---|
| author | Wright, James R. Leyton-Brown, Kevin |
| author_facet | Wright, James R. Leyton-Brown, Kevin |
| contents | It is common to make a distinction between "strategic" behavior and other forms of intentional but "nonstrategic" behavior: typically, that strategic agents model other agents while nonstrategic agents do not. However, a crisp boundary between these concepts has proven elusive. This problem is pervasive throughout the game theoretic literature on bounded rationality and particularly critical in parts of the behavioral game theory literature that make an explicit distinction between the behavior of "nonstrategic" level-0 agents and "strategic" higher-level agents (e.g., the level-k and cognitive hierarchy models). Overall, work discussing bounded rationality rarely gives clear guidance on how the rationality of nonstrategic agents must be bounded, instead typically just singling out specific decision rules (e.g., randomizing uniformly, playing toward the best case, optimizing the worst case) and informally asserting that they are nonstrategic. In this work, we propose a new, formal characterization of nonstrategic behavior. Our main contribution is to show that it satisfies two properties: (1) it is general enough to capture all purportedly "nonstrategic" decision rules of which we are aware in the behavioral game theory literature; (2) behavior that obeys our characterization is distinct from strategic behavior in a precise sense. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_1812_11571 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2018 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | A Formal Separation Between Strategic and Nonstrategic Behavior Wright, James R. Leyton-Brown, Kevin Computer Science and Game Theory It is common to make a distinction between "strategic" behavior and other forms of intentional but "nonstrategic" behavior: typically, that strategic agents model other agents while nonstrategic agents do not. However, a crisp boundary between these concepts has proven elusive. This problem is pervasive throughout the game theoretic literature on bounded rationality and particularly critical in parts of the behavioral game theory literature that make an explicit distinction between the behavior of "nonstrategic" level-0 agents and "strategic" higher-level agents (e.g., the level-k and cognitive hierarchy models). Overall, work discussing bounded rationality rarely gives clear guidance on how the rationality of nonstrategic agents must be bounded, instead typically just singling out specific decision rules (e.g., randomizing uniformly, playing toward the best case, optimizing the worst case) and informally asserting that they are nonstrategic. In this work, we propose a new, formal characterization of nonstrategic behavior. Our main contribution is to show that it satisfies two properties: (1) it is general enough to capture all purportedly "nonstrategic" decision rules of which we are aware in the behavioral game theory literature; (2) behavior that obeys our characterization is distinct from strategic behavior in a precise sense. |
| title | A Formal Separation Between Strategic and Nonstrategic Behavior |
| topic | Computer Science and Game Theory |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/1812.11571 |