Deep learning versus $\ell^1$-minimization for compressed sensing photoacoustic tomography
Fuente:
arXiv
Salvato in:
| Autori principali: | , , |
|---|---|
| Natura: | Preprint |
| Pubblicazione: |
2019
|
| Soggetti: | |
| Accesso online: | |
| Tags: |
Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
|
| _version_ | 1866910753170128896 |
|---|---|
| author | Antholzer, Stephan Schwab, Johannes Haltmeier, Markus |
| author_facet | Antholzer, Stephan Schwab, Johannes Haltmeier, Markus |
| contents | We investigate compressed sensing (CS) techniques for reducing the number of measurements in photoacoustic tomography (PAT). High resolution imaging from CS data requires particular image reconstruction algorithms. The most established reconstruction techniques for that purpose use sparsity and $\ell^1$-minimization. Recently, deep learning appeared as a new paradigm for CS and other inverse problems. In this paper, we compare a recently invented joint $\ell^1$-minimization algorithm with two deep learning methods, namely a residual network and an approximate nullspace network. We present numerical results showing that all developed techniques perform well for deterministic sparse measurements as well as for random Bernoulli measurements. For the deterministic sampling, deep learning shows more accurate results, whereas for Bernoulli measurements the $\ell^1$-minimization algorithm performs best. Comparing the implemented deep learning approaches, we show that the nullspace network uniformly outperforms the residual network in terms of the mean squared error (MSE). |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_1901_06510 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2019 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Deep learning versus $\ell^1$-minimization for compressed sensing photoacoustic tomography Antholzer, Stephan Schwab, Johannes Haltmeier, Markus Numerical Analysis Medical Physics We investigate compressed sensing (CS) techniques for reducing the number of measurements in photoacoustic tomography (PAT). High resolution imaging from CS data requires particular image reconstruction algorithms. The most established reconstruction techniques for that purpose use sparsity and $\ell^1$-minimization. Recently, deep learning appeared as a new paradigm for CS and other inverse problems. In this paper, we compare a recently invented joint $\ell^1$-minimization algorithm with two deep learning methods, namely a residual network and an approximate nullspace network. We present numerical results showing that all developed techniques perform well for deterministic sparse measurements as well as for random Bernoulli measurements. For the deterministic sampling, deep learning shows more accurate results, whereas for Bernoulli measurements the $\ell^1$-minimization algorithm performs best. Comparing the implemented deep learning approaches, we show that the nullspace network uniformly outperforms the residual network in terms of the mean squared error (MSE). |
| title | Deep learning versus $\ell^1$-minimization for compressed sensing photoacoustic tomography |
| topic | Numerical Analysis Medical Physics |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/1901.06510 |