Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bayati, Mohsen, Hamidi, Nima, Johari, Ramesh, Khosravi, Khashayar
Format: Preprint
Published: 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arxiv.org/abs/2002.10121
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866916167379058688
author Bayati, Mohsen
Hamidi, Nima
Johari, Ramesh
Khosravi, Khashayar
author_facet Bayati, Mohsen
Hamidi, Nima
Johari, Ramesh
Khosravi, Khashayar
contents We investigate a Bayesian $k$-armed bandit problem in the \emph{many-armed} regime, where $k \geq \sqrt{T}$ and $T$ represents the time horizon. Initially, and aligned with recent literature on many-armed bandit problems, we observe that subsampling plays a key role in designing optimal algorithms; the conventional UCB algorithm is sub-optimal, whereas a subsampled UCB (SS-UCB), which selects $Θ(\sqrt{T})$ arms for execution under the UCB framework, achieves rate-optimality. However, despite SS-UCB's theoretical promise of optimal regret, it empirically underperforms compared to a greedy algorithm that consistently chooses the empirically best arm. This observation extends to contextual settings through simulations with real-world data. Our findings suggest a new form of \emph{free exploration} beneficial to greedy algorithms in the many-armed context, fundamentally linked to a tail event concerning the prior distribution of arm rewards. This finding diverges from the notion of free exploration, which relates to covariate variation, as recently discussed in contextual bandit literature. Expanding upon these insights, we establish that the subsampled greedy approach not only achieves rate-optimality for Bernoulli bandits within the many-armed regime but also attains sublinear regret across broader distributions. Collectively, our research indicates that in the many-armed regime, practitioners might find greater value in adopting greedy algorithms.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2002_10121
institution arXiv
publishDate 2020
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Greedy Algorithms in Multi-Armed Bandit with Many Arms
Bayati, Mohsen
Hamidi, Nima
Johari, Ramesh
Khosravi, Khashayar
Machine Learning
We investigate a Bayesian $k$-armed bandit problem in the \emph{many-armed} regime, where $k \geq \sqrt{T}$ and $T$ represents the time horizon. Initially, and aligned with recent literature on many-armed bandit problems, we observe that subsampling plays a key role in designing optimal algorithms; the conventional UCB algorithm is sub-optimal, whereas a subsampled UCB (SS-UCB), which selects $Θ(\sqrt{T})$ arms for execution under the UCB framework, achieves rate-optimality. However, despite SS-UCB's theoretical promise of optimal regret, it empirically underperforms compared to a greedy algorithm that consistently chooses the empirically best arm. This observation extends to contextual settings through simulations with real-world data. Our findings suggest a new form of \emph{free exploration} beneficial to greedy algorithms in the many-armed context, fundamentally linked to a tail event concerning the prior distribution of arm rewards. This finding diverges from the notion of free exploration, which relates to covariate variation, as recently discussed in contextual bandit literature. Expanding upon these insights, we establish that the subsampled greedy approach not only achieves rate-optimality for Bernoulli bandits within the many-armed regime but also attains sublinear regret across broader distributions. Collectively, our research indicates that in the many-armed regime, practitioners might find greater value in adopting greedy algorithms.
title The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Greedy Algorithms in Multi-Armed Bandit with Many Arms
topic Machine Learning
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2002.10121