Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2020
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.05422 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Table of Contents:
- A subgroup of the automorphism group of a graph acts {\em half-arc-transitively} on the graph if it acts transitively on the vertex-set and on the edge-set of the graph but not on the arc-set of the graph. If the full automorphism group of the graph acts half-arc-transitively, the graph is said to be {\em half-arc-transitive}. In 1994 Gardiner and Praeger introduced two families of tetravalent arc-transitive graphs, called the $C^{\pm 1}$ and the $C^{\pm \varepsilon}$ graphs, that play a prominent role in the characterization of the tetravalent graphs admitting an arc-transitive group of automorphisms with a normal elementary abelian subgroup such that the corresponding quotient graph is a cycle. All of the Gardiner-Praeger graphs are arc-transitive but admit a half-arc-transitive group of automorphisms. Quite recently, Poto\v cnik and Wilson introduced the family of CPM graphs, which are generalizations of the Gardiner-Praeger graphs. Most of these graphs are arc-transitive, but some of them are half-arc-transitive. In fact, at least up to order $1000$, each tetravalent half-arc-transitive loosely-attached graph of odd radius having vertex-stabilizers of order greater than $2$ is isomorphic to a CPM graph. In this paper we determine the automorphism group of the CPM graphs and investigate isomorphisms between them. Moreover, we determine which of these graphs are $2$-arc-transitive, which are arc-transitive but not $2$-arc-transitive, and which are half-arc-transitive.