Uncertainty in Bayesian Leave-One-Out Cross-Validation Based Model Comparison
Fuente:
arXiv
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2020
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866915580123021312 |
|---|---|
| author | Sivula, Tuomas Magnusson, Måns Matamoros, Asael Alonzo Vehtari, Aki |
| author_facet | Sivula, Tuomas Magnusson, Måns Matamoros, Asael Alonzo Vehtari, Aki |
| contents | It is useful to estimate the expected predictive performance of models planned to be used for prediction. We focus on leave-one-out cross-validation (LOO-CV), which has become a popular method for estimating predictive performance of Bayesian models. Given two models, we are interested in comparing the predictive performances and associated uncertainty, which can also be used to compute the probability of one model having better predictive performance than the other model. We study the properties of the Bayesian LOO-CV estimator and the related uncertainty quantification for the predictive performance difference, and analyse when a normal approximation of this uncertainty is well calibrated and whether taking into account higher moments could improve the approximation. We provide new results of the properties both theoretically in the linear regression case and empirically for hierarchical linear, latent linear, and spline models and discuss the challenges. We show that problematic cases include: comparing models with similar predictions, misspecified models, and small data. In these cases, there is a weak connection between the distributions of the LOO-CV estimator and its error. We show that that the problematic skewness of the error distribution for the difference, which occurs when the models make similar predictions, does not fade away when the data size grows to infinity in certain situations. Based on the results, we also provide some practical recommendations for the users of Bayesian LOO-CV for comparing predictive performance of models. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2008_10296 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2020 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Uncertainty in Bayesian Leave-One-Out Cross-Validation Based Model Comparison Sivula, Tuomas Magnusson, Måns Matamoros, Asael Alonzo Vehtari, Aki Methodology It is useful to estimate the expected predictive performance of models planned to be used for prediction. We focus on leave-one-out cross-validation (LOO-CV), which has become a popular method for estimating predictive performance of Bayesian models. Given two models, we are interested in comparing the predictive performances and associated uncertainty, which can also be used to compute the probability of one model having better predictive performance than the other model. We study the properties of the Bayesian LOO-CV estimator and the related uncertainty quantification for the predictive performance difference, and analyse when a normal approximation of this uncertainty is well calibrated and whether taking into account higher moments could improve the approximation. We provide new results of the properties both theoretically in the linear regression case and empirically for hierarchical linear, latent linear, and spline models and discuss the challenges. We show that problematic cases include: comparing models with similar predictions, misspecified models, and small data. In these cases, there is a weak connection between the distributions of the LOO-CV estimator and its error. We show that that the problematic skewness of the error distribution for the difference, which occurs when the models make similar predictions, does not fade away when the data size grows to infinity in certain situations. Based on the results, we also provide some practical recommendations for the users of Bayesian LOO-CV for comparing predictive performance of models. |
| title | Uncertainty in Bayesian Leave-One-Out Cross-Validation Based Model Comparison |
| topic | Methodology |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2008.10296 |