Enregistré dans:
| Auteurs principaux: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Publié: |
2020
|
| Sujets: | |
| Accès en ligne: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2011.10031 |
| Tags: |
Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
|
| _version_ | 1866929294579597312 |
|---|---|
| author | Gavorová, Zuzana Seidel, Matan Touati, Yonathan |
| author_facet | Gavorová, Zuzana Seidel, Matan Touati, Yonathan |
| contents | Algorithms with unitary oracles can be nested, which makes them extremely versatile. An example is the phase estimation algorithm used in many candidate algorithms for quantum speed-up. The search for new quantum algorithms benefits from understanding their limitations: Some tasks are impossible in quantum circuits, although their classical versions are easy, for example, cloning. An example with a unitary oracle $U$ is the if clause, the task to implement controlled $U$ (up to the phase on $U$). In classical computation the conditional statement is easy and essential. In quantum circuits the if clause was shown impossible from one query to $U$. Is it possible from polynomially many queries? Here we unify algorithms with a unitary oracle and develop a topological method to prove their limitations: No number of queries to $U$ and $U^\dagger$ lets quantum circuits implement the if clause, even if admitting approximations, postselection and relaxed causality. We also show limitations of process tomography, oracle neutralization, and $\sqrt[\dim U]{U}$, $U^T$, and $U^\dagger$ algorithms. Our results strengthen an advantage of linear optics, challenge the experiments on relaxed causality, and motivate new algorithms with many-outcome measurements. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2011_10031 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2020 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Topological obstructions to quantum computation with unitary oracles Gavorová, Zuzana Seidel, Matan Touati, Yonathan Quantum Physics Algorithms with unitary oracles can be nested, which makes them extremely versatile. An example is the phase estimation algorithm used in many candidate algorithms for quantum speed-up. The search for new quantum algorithms benefits from understanding their limitations: Some tasks are impossible in quantum circuits, although their classical versions are easy, for example, cloning. An example with a unitary oracle $U$ is the if clause, the task to implement controlled $U$ (up to the phase on $U$). In classical computation the conditional statement is easy and essential. In quantum circuits the if clause was shown impossible from one query to $U$. Is it possible from polynomially many queries? Here we unify algorithms with a unitary oracle and develop a topological method to prove their limitations: No number of queries to $U$ and $U^\dagger$ lets quantum circuits implement the if clause, even if admitting approximations, postselection and relaxed causality. We also show limitations of process tomography, oracle neutralization, and $\sqrt[\dim U]{U}$, $U^T$, and $U^\dagger$ algorithms. Our results strengthen an advantage of linear optics, challenge the experiments on relaxed causality, and motivate new algorithms with many-outcome measurements. |
| title | Topological obstructions to quantum computation with unitary oracles |
| topic | Quantum Physics |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2011.10031 |