QBians Do Not Exist
Fuente:
arXiv
Salvato in:
| Autori principali: | , |
|---|---|
| Natura: | Preprint |
| Pubblicazione: |
2020
|
| Soggetti: | |
| Accesso online: | |
| Tags: |
Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
|
| _version_ | 1866909958855983104 |
|---|---|
| author | Fuchs, Christopher A. Stacey, Blake C. |
| author_facet | Fuchs, Christopher A. Stacey, Blake C. |
| contents | We remark on John Earman's paper ``Quantum Bayesianism Assessed'' [The Monist 102 (2019), 403--423], illustrating with a number of examples that the quantum ``interpretation'' Earman critiques and the interpretation known as QBism have almost nothing to do with each other. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2012_14375 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2020 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | QBians Do Not Exist Fuchs, Christopher A. Stacey, Blake C. Quantum Physics History and Philosophy of Physics We remark on John Earman's paper ``Quantum Bayesianism Assessed'' [The Monist 102 (2019), 403--423], illustrating with a number of examples that the quantum ``interpretation'' Earman critiques and the interpretation known as QBism have almost nothing to do with each other. |
| title | QBians Do Not Exist |
| topic | Quantum Physics History and Philosophy of Physics |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2012.14375 |