Local Projections vs. VARs: Lessons From Thousands of DGPs

Fuente: arXiv
Salvato in:
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autori principali: Li, Dake, Plagborg-Møller, Mikkel, Wolf, Christian K.
Natura: Preprint
Pubblicazione: 2021
Soggetti:
Accesso online:
Tags: Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
_version_ 1866909079719378944
author Li, Dake
Plagborg-Møller, Mikkel
Wolf, Christian K.
author_facet Li, Dake
Plagborg-Møller, Mikkel
Wolf, Christian K.
contents We conduct a simulation study of Local Projection (LP) and Vector Autoregression (VAR) estimators of structural impulse responses across thousands of data generating processes, designed to mimic the properties of the universe of U.S. macroeconomic data. Our analysis considers various identification schemes and several variants of LP and VAR estimators, employing bias correction, shrinkage, or model averaging. A clear bias-variance trade-off emerges: LP estimators have lower bias than VAR estimators, but they also have substantially higher variance at intermediate and long horizons. Bias-corrected LP is the preferred method if and only if the researcher overwhelmingly prioritizes bias. For researchers who also care about precision, VAR methods are the most attractive -- Bayesian VARs at short and long horizons, and least-squares VARs at intermediate and long horizons.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2104_00655
institution arXiv
publishDate 2021
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Local Projections vs. VARs: Lessons From Thousands of DGPs
Li, Dake
Plagborg-Møller, Mikkel
Wolf, Christian K.
Econometrics
We conduct a simulation study of Local Projection (LP) and Vector Autoregression (VAR) estimators of structural impulse responses across thousands of data generating processes, designed to mimic the properties of the universe of U.S. macroeconomic data. Our analysis considers various identification schemes and several variants of LP and VAR estimators, employing bias correction, shrinkage, or model averaging. A clear bias-variance trade-off emerges: LP estimators have lower bias than VAR estimators, but they also have substantially higher variance at intermediate and long horizons. Bias-corrected LP is the preferred method if and only if the researcher overwhelmingly prioritizes bias. For researchers who also care about precision, VAR methods are the most attractive -- Bayesian VARs at short and long horizons, and least-squares VARs at intermediate and long horizons.
title Local Projections vs. VARs: Lessons From Thousands of DGPs
topic Econometrics
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2104.00655