Synthetic likelihood in misspecified models

Fuente: arXiv
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Frazier, David T., Drovandi, Christopher, Nott, David J.
Format: Preprint
Published: 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866913037360824320
author Frazier, David T.
Drovandi, Christopher
Nott, David J.
author_facet Frazier, David T.
Drovandi, Christopher
Nott, David J.
contents Bayesian synthetic likelihood is a widely used approach for conducting Bayesian analysis in complex models where evaluation of the likelihood is infeasible but simulation from the assumed model is tractable. We analyze the behaviour of the Bayesian synthetic likelihood posterior when the assumed model differs from the actual data generating process. We demonstrate that the Bayesian synthetic likelihood posterior can display a wide range of non-standard behaviours depending on the level of model misspecification, including multimodality and asymptotic non-Gaussianity. Our results suggest that likelihood tempering, a common approach for robust Bayesian inference, fails for synthetic likelihood whilst recently proposed robust synthetic likelihood approaches can ameliorate this behavior and deliver reliable posterior inference under model misspecification. All results are illustrated using a simple running example.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2104_03436
institution arXiv
publishDate 2021
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Synthetic likelihood in misspecified models
Frazier, David T.
Drovandi, Christopher
Nott, David J.
Statistics Theory
Methodology
Bayesian synthetic likelihood is a widely used approach for conducting Bayesian analysis in complex models where evaluation of the likelihood is infeasible but simulation from the assumed model is tractable. We analyze the behaviour of the Bayesian synthetic likelihood posterior when the assumed model differs from the actual data generating process. We demonstrate that the Bayesian synthetic likelihood posterior can display a wide range of non-standard behaviours depending on the level of model misspecification, including multimodality and asymptotic non-Gaussianity. Our results suggest that likelihood tempering, a common approach for robust Bayesian inference, fails for synthetic likelihood whilst recently proposed robust synthetic likelihood approaches can ameliorate this behavior and deliver reliable posterior inference under model misspecification. All results are illustrated using a simple running example.
title Synthetic likelihood in misspecified models
topic Statistics Theory
Methodology
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2104.03436