Detecting AutoAttack Perturbations in the Frequency Domain

Fuente: arXiv
Salvato in:
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autori principali: Lorenz, Peter, Harder, Paula, Strassel, Dominik, Keuper, Margret, Keuper, Janis
Natura: Preprint
Pubblicazione: 2021
Soggetti:
Accesso online:
Tags: Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
_version_ 1866909112636276736
author Lorenz, Peter
Harder, Paula
Strassel, Dominik
Keuper, Margret
Keuper, Janis
author_facet Lorenz, Peter
Harder, Paula
Strassel, Dominik
Keuper, Margret
Keuper, Janis
contents Recently, adversarial attacks on image classification networks by the AutoAttack (Croce and Hein, 2020b) framework have drawn a lot of attention. While AutoAttack has shown a very high attack success rate, most defense approaches are focusing on network hardening and robustness enhancements, like adversarial training. This way, the currently best-reported method can withstand about 66% of adversarial examples on CIFAR10. In this paper, we investigate the spatial and frequency domain properties of AutoAttack and propose an alternative defense. Instead of hardening a network, we detect adversarial attacks during inference, rejecting manipulated inputs. Based on a rather simple and fast analysis in the frequency domain, we introduce two different detection algorithms. First, a black box detector that only operates on the input images and achieves a detection accuracy of 100% on the AutoAttack CIFAR10 benchmark and 99.3% on ImageNet, for epsilon = 8/255 in both cases. Second, a whitebox detector using an analysis of CNN feature maps, leading to a detection rate of also 100% and 98.7% on the same benchmarks.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2111_08785
institution arXiv
publishDate 2021
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Detecting AutoAttack Perturbations in the Frequency Domain
Lorenz, Peter
Harder, Paula
Strassel, Dominik
Keuper, Margret
Keuper, Janis
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
Cryptography and Security
Recently, adversarial attacks on image classification networks by the AutoAttack (Croce and Hein, 2020b) framework have drawn a lot of attention. While AutoAttack has shown a very high attack success rate, most defense approaches are focusing on network hardening and robustness enhancements, like adversarial training. This way, the currently best-reported method can withstand about 66% of adversarial examples on CIFAR10. In this paper, we investigate the spatial and frequency domain properties of AutoAttack and propose an alternative defense. Instead of hardening a network, we detect adversarial attacks during inference, rejecting manipulated inputs. Based on a rather simple and fast analysis in the frequency domain, we introduce two different detection algorithms. First, a black box detector that only operates on the input images and achieves a detection accuracy of 100% on the AutoAttack CIFAR10 benchmark and 99.3% on ImageNet, for epsilon = 8/255 in both cases. Second, a whitebox detector using an analysis of CNN feature maps, leading to a detection rate of also 100% and 98.7% on the same benchmarks.
title Detecting AutoAttack Perturbations in the Frequency Domain
topic Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
Cryptography and Security
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2111.08785