Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Morucci, Marco, Foster, Margaret, Webster, Kaitlyn, Lee, So Jin, Siegel, David
Format: Preprint
Published: 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arxiv.org/abs/2111.11979
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866916262956761088
author Morucci, Marco
Foster, Margaret
Webster, Kaitlyn
Lee, So Jin
Siegel, David
author_facet Morucci, Marco
Foster, Margaret
Webster, Kaitlyn
Lee, So Jin
Siegel, David
contents Measurement bridges theory and empirics. Without measures that appropriately capture theoretical concepts, description will fail to represent reality and true causal inference will be impossible. Yet, the social sciences traffic in complex concepts and their measurement is difficult. Item Response Theory (IRT) models reduce variation in multiple variables to continuous variation along one or more latent dimensions intended to capture key theoretical concepts. Unfortunately, those latent dimensions have no intrinsic conceptual meaning. Partial solutions to that problem include limiting the number of dimensions to one or assigning meaning post-analysis, but either can lead to potential bias and a lack of reliability across data sources. We propose, detail, and validate a semi-supervised approach employing Bayesian Item Response Theory on multiple latent dimensions and binary data. Our approach, which we validate on simulated and real data, yields conceptually meaningful latent dimensions that are reliable across different data sources without additional exogenous assumptions.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2111_11979
institution arXiv
publishDate 2021
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Measurement That Matches Theory: Theory-Driven Identification in IRT Models
Morucci, Marco
Foster, Margaret
Webster, Kaitlyn
Lee, So Jin
Siegel, David
Applications
Measurement bridges theory and empirics. Without measures that appropriately capture theoretical concepts, description will fail to represent reality and true causal inference will be impossible. Yet, the social sciences traffic in complex concepts and their measurement is difficult. Item Response Theory (IRT) models reduce variation in multiple variables to continuous variation along one or more latent dimensions intended to capture key theoretical concepts. Unfortunately, those latent dimensions have no intrinsic conceptual meaning. Partial solutions to that problem include limiting the number of dimensions to one or assigning meaning post-analysis, but either can lead to potential bias and a lack of reliability across data sources. We propose, detail, and validate a semi-supervised approach employing Bayesian Item Response Theory on multiple latent dimensions and binary data. Our approach, which we validate on simulated and real data, yields conceptually meaningful latent dimensions that are reliable across different data sources without additional exogenous assumptions.
title Measurement That Matches Theory: Theory-Driven Identification in IRT Models
topic Applications
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2111.11979