Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Renedo-Mirambell, Martí, Arratia, Argimiro
Format: Preprint
Published: 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arxiv.org/abs/2112.06287
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866909676099076096
author Renedo-Mirambell, Martí
Arratia, Argimiro
author_facet Renedo-Mirambell, Martí
Arratia, Argimiro
contents We study potential biases of popular cluster quality metrics, such as conductance or modularity. We propose a method that uses both stochastic and preferential attachment block models construction to generate networks with preset community structures, to which quality metrics will be applied. These models also allow us to generate multi-level structures of varying strength, which will show if metrics favour partitions into a larger or smaller number of clusters. Additionally, we propose another quality metric, the density ratio. We observed that most of the studied metrics tend to favour partitions into a smaller number of big clusters, even when their relative internal and external connectivity are the same. The metrics found to be less biased are modularity and density ratio.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2112_06287
institution arXiv
publishDate 2021
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Identifying bias in cluster quality metrics
Renedo-Mirambell, Martí
Arratia, Argimiro
Physics and Society
Machine Learning
Social and Information Networks
I.5.3; I.5.2
We study potential biases of popular cluster quality metrics, such as conductance or modularity. We propose a method that uses both stochastic and preferential attachment block models construction to generate networks with preset community structures, to which quality metrics will be applied. These models also allow us to generate multi-level structures of varying strength, which will show if metrics favour partitions into a larger or smaller number of clusters. Additionally, we propose another quality metric, the density ratio. We observed that most of the studied metrics tend to favour partitions into a smaller number of big clusters, even when their relative internal and external connectivity are the same. The metrics found to be less biased are modularity and density ratio.
title Identifying bias in cluster quality metrics
topic Physics and Society
Machine Learning
Social and Information Networks
I.5.3; I.5.2
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2112.06287