Salvato in:
| Autore principale: | |
|---|---|
| Natura: | Preprint |
| Pubblicazione: |
2022
|
| Soggetti: | |
| Accesso online: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.07958 |
| Tags: |
Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
|
| _version_ | 1866910327482875904 |
|---|---|
| author | Stekolshchik, Rafael |
| author_facet | Stekolshchik, Rafael |
| contents | For any two root subsets associated with two Carter diagrams that have the same $ADE$ type and the same size, we construct the transition matrix that maps one subset to the other. The transition between these two subsets is carried out in some canonical way affecting exactly one root, so that this root is mapped to the minimal element in some root subsystem. The constructed transitions are involutions. It is shown that all root subsets associated with the given Carter diagram are conjugate under the action of the Weyl group. A numerical relationship is observed between enhanced Dynkin diagrams $Δ(E_6)$, $Δ(E_7)$ and $Δ(E_8)$ (introduced by Dynkin-Minchenko) and Carter diagrams. This relationship echoes the $2-4-8$ assertions obtained by Ringel, Rosenfeld and Baez in completely different contexts regarding the Dynkin diagrams $E_6$, $E_7$, $E_8$. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2203_07958 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2022 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Transitions between root subsets associated with Carter diagrams Stekolshchik, Rafael Representation Theory 20F55, 20E45, 15A18 For any two root subsets associated with two Carter diagrams that have the same $ADE$ type and the same size, we construct the transition matrix that maps one subset to the other. The transition between these two subsets is carried out in some canonical way affecting exactly one root, so that this root is mapped to the minimal element in some root subsystem. The constructed transitions are involutions. It is shown that all root subsets associated with the given Carter diagram are conjugate under the action of the Weyl group. A numerical relationship is observed between enhanced Dynkin diagrams $Δ(E_6)$, $Δ(E_7)$ and $Δ(E_8)$ (introduced by Dynkin-Minchenko) and Carter diagrams. This relationship echoes the $2-4-8$ assertions obtained by Ringel, Rosenfeld and Baez in completely different contexts regarding the Dynkin diagrams $E_6$, $E_7$, $E_8$. |
| title | Transitions between root subsets associated with Carter diagrams |
| topic | Representation Theory 20F55, 20E45, 15A18 |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.07958 |