Enregistré dans:
Détails bibliographiques
Auteurs principaux: Hebnes, Oliver Lerstøl, Bathen, Marianne Etzelmüller, Schøyen, Øyvind Sigmundson, Larsen, Sebastian G. Winther, Vines, Lasse, Hjorth-Jensen, Morten
Format: Preprint
Publié: 2022
Sujets:
Accès en ligne:https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.16203
Tags: Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
_version_ 1866917888328204288
author Hebnes, Oliver Lerstøl
Bathen, Marianne Etzelmüller
Schøyen, Øyvind Sigmundson
Larsen, Sebastian G. Winther
Vines, Lasse
Hjorth-Jensen, Morten
author_facet Hebnes, Oliver Lerstøl
Bathen, Marianne Etzelmüller
Schøyen, Øyvind Sigmundson
Larsen, Sebastian G. Winther
Vines, Lasse
Hjorth-Jensen, Morten
contents Semiconductor materials provide a compelling platform for quantum technologies (QT), and the properties of a vast amount of materials can be found in databases containing information from both experimental and theoretical explorations. However, searching these databases to find promising candidate materials for quantum technology applications is a major challenge. Therefore, we have developed a framework for the automated discovery of semiconductor host platforms for QT using material informatics and machine learning methods, resulting in a dataset consisting of over $25.000$ materials and nearly $5000$ physics-informed features. Three approaches were devised, named the Ferrenti, extended Ferrenti and the empirical approach, to label data for the supervised machine learning (ML) methods logistic regression, decision trees, random forests and gradient boosting. We find that of the three, the empirical approach relying exclusively on findings from the literature predicted substantially fewer candidates than the other two approaches with a clear distinction between suitable and unsuitable candidates when comparing the two largest eigenvalues in the covariance matrix. In contrast to expectations from the literature and that found for the Ferrenti and extended Ferrenti approaches focusing on band gap and ionic character, the ML methods from the empirical approach highlighted features related to symmetry and crystal structure, including bond length, orientation and radial distribution, as influential when predicting a material as suitable for QT. All three approaches and all four ML methods agreed on a subset of $47$ eligible candidates %(to a probability of $>50 \ \%$) of $8$ elemental, $29$ binary, and $10$ tertiary compounds, and provide a basis for further material explorations towards quantum technology.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2203_16203
institution arXiv
publishDate 2022
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Predicting Solid State Material Platforms for Quantum Technologies
Hebnes, Oliver Lerstøl
Bathen, Marianne Etzelmüller
Schøyen, Øyvind Sigmundson
Larsen, Sebastian G. Winther
Vines, Lasse
Hjorth-Jensen, Morten
Materials Science
Computational Physics
Data Analysis, Statistics and Probability
Semiconductor materials provide a compelling platform for quantum technologies (QT), and the properties of a vast amount of materials can be found in databases containing information from both experimental and theoretical explorations. However, searching these databases to find promising candidate materials for quantum technology applications is a major challenge. Therefore, we have developed a framework for the automated discovery of semiconductor host platforms for QT using material informatics and machine learning methods, resulting in a dataset consisting of over $25.000$ materials and nearly $5000$ physics-informed features. Three approaches were devised, named the Ferrenti, extended Ferrenti and the empirical approach, to label data for the supervised machine learning (ML) methods logistic regression, decision trees, random forests and gradient boosting. We find that of the three, the empirical approach relying exclusively on findings from the literature predicted substantially fewer candidates than the other two approaches with a clear distinction between suitable and unsuitable candidates when comparing the two largest eigenvalues in the covariance matrix. In contrast to expectations from the literature and that found for the Ferrenti and extended Ferrenti approaches focusing on band gap and ionic character, the ML methods from the empirical approach highlighted features related to symmetry and crystal structure, including bond length, orientation and radial distribution, as influential when predicting a material as suitable for QT. All three approaches and all four ML methods agreed on a subset of $47$ eligible candidates %(to a probability of $>50 \ \%$) of $8$ elemental, $29$ binary, and $10$ tertiary compounds, and provide a basis for further material explorations towards quantum technology.
title Predicting Solid State Material Platforms for Quantum Technologies
topic Materials Science
Computational Physics
Data Analysis, Statistics and Probability
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.16203