To ArXiv or not to ArXiv: A Study Quantifying Pros and Cons of Posting Preprints Online
Fuente:
arXiv
Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Veröffentlicht: |
2022
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| _version_ | 1866918265685540864 |
|---|---|
| author | Rastogi, Charvi Stelmakh, Ivan Shen, Xinwei Meila, Marina Echenique, Federico Chawla, Shuchi Shah, Nihar B. |
| author_facet | Rastogi, Charvi Stelmakh, Ivan Shen, Xinwei Meila, Marina Echenique, Federico Chawla, Shuchi Shah, Nihar B. |
| contents | Double-blind conferences have engaged in debates over whether to allow authors to post their papers online on arXiv or elsewhere during the review process. Independently, some authors of research papers face the dilemma of whether to put their papers on arXiv due to its pros and cons. We conduct a study to substantiate this debate and dilemma via quantitative measurements. Specifically, we conducted surveys of reviewers in two top-tier double-blind computer science conferences -- ICML 2021 (5361 submissions and 4699 reviewers) and EC 2021 (498 submissions and 190 reviewers). Our three main findings are as follows. First, more than a third of the reviewers self-report searching online for a paper they are assigned to review. Second, conference policies restricting authors from publicising their work on social media or posting preprints before the review process may have only limited effectiveness in maintaining anonymity. Third, outside the review process, we find that preprints from better-ranked institutions experience a very small increase in visibility compared to preprints from other institutions. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2203_17259 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2022 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | To ArXiv or not to ArXiv: A Study Quantifying Pros and Cons of Posting Preprints Online Rastogi, Charvi Stelmakh, Ivan Shen, Xinwei Meila, Marina Echenique, Federico Chawla, Shuchi Shah, Nihar B. Digital Libraries Applications Double-blind conferences have engaged in debates over whether to allow authors to post their papers online on arXiv or elsewhere during the review process. Independently, some authors of research papers face the dilemma of whether to put their papers on arXiv due to its pros and cons. We conduct a study to substantiate this debate and dilemma via quantitative measurements. Specifically, we conducted surveys of reviewers in two top-tier double-blind computer science conferences -- ICML 2021 (5361 submissions and 4699 reviewers) and EC 2021 (498 submissions and 190 reviewers). Our three main findings are as follows. First, more than a third of the reviewers self-report searching online for a paper they are assigned to review. Second, conference policies restricting authors from publicising their work on social media or posting preprints before the review process may have only limited effectiveness in maintaining anonymity. Third, outside the review process, we find that preprints from better-ranked institutions experience a very small increase in visibility compared to preprints from other institutions. |
| title | To ArXiv or not to ArXiv: A Study Quantifying Pros and Cons of Posting Preprints Online |
| topic | Digital Libraries Applications |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.17259 |