The Power of Filling in Balanced Allocations

Fuente: arXiv
Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Los, Dimitrios, Sauerwald, Thomas, Sylvester, John
Format: Preprint
Veröffentlicht: 2022
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
_version_ 1866910025844260864
author Los, Dimitrios
Sauerwald, Thomas
Sylvester, John
author_facet Los, Dimitrios
Sauerwald, Thomas
Sylvester, John
contents We introduce a new class of balanced allocation processes which are primarily characterized by ``filling'' underloaded bins. A prototypical example is the Packing process: At each round we only take one bin sample, if the load is below the average load, then we place as many balls until the average load is reached; otherwise, we place only one ball. We prove that for any process in this class the gap between the maximum and average load is $\mathcal{O}(\log n)$ w.h.p. for any number of balls $m\geq 1$. For the Packing process, we also provide a matching lower bound. Additionally, we prove that the Packing process is sample-efficient in the sense that the expected number of balls allocated per sample is strictly greater than one. Finally, we also demonstrate that the upper bound of $\mathcal{O}(\log n)$ on the gap can be extended to the Memory process studied by Mitzenmacher, Prabhakar and Shah (2002).
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2204_04057
institution arXiv
publishDate 2022
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle The Power of Filling in Balanced Allocations
Los, Dimitrios
Sauerwald, Thomas
Sylvester, John
Discrete Mathematics
Data Structures and Algorithms
Combinatorics
Probability
68W20, 68W27, 68W40, 60C05
G.3; G.2.m; F.2.2
We introduce a new class of balanced allocation processes which are primarily characterized by ``filling'' underloaded bins. A prototypical example is the Packing process: At each round we only take one bin sample, if the load is below the average load, then we place as many balls until the average load is reached; otherwise, we place only one ball. We prove that for any process in this class the gap between the maximum and average load is $\mathcal{O}(\log n)$ w.h.p. for any number of balls $m\geq 1$. For the Packing process, we also provide a matching lower bound. Additionally, we prove that the Packing process is sample-efficient in the sense that the expected number of balls allocated per sample is strictly greater than one. Finally, we also demonstrate that the upper bound of $\mathcal{O}(\log n)$ on the gap can be extended to the Memory process studied by Mitzenmacher, Prabhakar and Shah (2002).
title The Power of Filling in Balanced Allocations
topic Discrete Mathematics
Data Structures and Algorithms
Combinatorics
Probability
68W20, 68W27, 68W40, 60C05
G.3; G.2.m; F.2.2
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2204.04057