Partial frontiers are not quantiles

Fuente: arXiv
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dai, Sheng, Kuosmanen, Timo, Zhou, Xun
Format: Preprint
Published: 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866908579693330432
author Dai, Sheng
Kuosmanen, Timo
Zhou, Xun
author_facet Dai, Sheng
Kuosmanen, Timo
Zhou, Xun
contents Quantile regression and partial frontier are two distinct approaches to nonparametric quantile frontier estimation. In this article, we demonstrate that partial frontiers are not quantiles. Both convex and nonconvex technologies are considered. To this end, we propose convexified order-$α$ as an alternative to convex quantile regression (CQR) and convex expectile regression (CER), and two new nonconvex estimators: isotonic CQR and isotonic CER as alternatives to order-$α$. A Monte Carlo study shows that the partial frontier estimators perform relatively poorly and even can violate the quantile property, particularly at low quantiles. In addition, the simulation evidence shows that the indirect expectile approach to estimating quantiles generally outperforms the direct quantile estimations. We further find that the convex estimators outperform their nonconvex counterparts owing to their global shape constraints. An illustration of those estimators is provided using a real-world dataset of U.S. electric power plants.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2205_11885
institution arXiv
publishDate 2022
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Partial frontiers are not quantiles
Dai, Sheng
Kuosmanen, Timo
Zhou, Xun
Methodology
Applications
Quantile regression and partial frontier are two distinct approaches to nonparametric quantile frontier estimation. In this article, we demonstrate that partial frontiers are not quantiles. Both convex and nonconvex technologies are considered. To this end, we propose convexified order-$α$ as an alternative to convex quantile regression (CQR) and convex expectile regression (CER), and two new nonconvex estimators: isotonic CQR and isotonic CER as alternatives to order-$α$. A Monte Carlo study shows that the partial frontier estimators perform relatively poorly and even can violate the quantile property, particularly at low quantiles. In addition, the simulation evidence shows that the indirect expectile approach to estimating quantiles generally outperforms the direct quantile estimations. We further find that the convex estimators outperform their nonconvex counterparts owing to their global shape constraints. An illustration of those estimators is provided using a real-world dataset of U.S. electric power plants.
title Partial frontiers are not quantiles
topic Methodology
Applications
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.11885