Bayesian multivariate logistic regression for superiority and inferiority decision-making under observable treatment heterogeneity

Fuente: arXiv
Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Kavelaars, Xynthia, Mulder, Joris, Kaptein, Maurits
Format: Preprint
Veröffentlicht: 2022
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
_version_ 1866929292574720000
author Kavelaars, Xynthia
Mulder, Joris
Kaptein, Maurits
author_facet Kavelaars, Xynthia
Mulder, Joris
Kaptein, Maurits
contents The effects of treatments may differ between persons with different characteristics. Addressing such treatment heterogeneity is crucial to investigate whether patients with specific characteristics are likely to benefit from a new treatment. The current paper presents a novel Bayesian method for superiority decision-making in the context of randomized controlled trials with multivariate binary responses and heterogeneous treatment effects. The framework is based on three elements: a) Bayesian multivariate logistic regression analysis with a Pólya-Gamma expansion; b) a transformation procedure to transfer obtained regression coefficients to a more intuitive multivariate probability scale (i.e., success probabilities and the differences between them); and c) a compatible decision procedure for treatment comparison with prespecified decision error rates. Procedures for a priori sample size estimation under a non-informative prior distribution are included. A numerical evaluation demonstrated that decisions based on a priori sample size estimation resulted in anticipated error rates among the trial population as well as subpopulations. Further, average and conditional treatment effect parameters could be estimated unbiasedly when the sample was large enough. Illustration with the International Stroke Trial dataset revealed a trend towards heterogeneous effects among stroke patients: Something that would have remained undetected when analyses were limited to average treatment effects.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2206_04133
institution arXiv
publishDate 2022
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Bayesian multivariate logistic regression for superiority and inferiority decision-making under observable treatment heterogeneity
Kavelaars, Xynthia
Mulder, Joris
Kaptein, Maurits
Methodology
The effects of treatments may differ between persons with different characteristics. Addressing such treatment heterogeneity is crucial to investigate whether patients with specific characteristics are likely to benefit from a new treatment. The current paper presents a novel Bayesian method for superiority decision-making in the context of randomized controlled trials with multivariate binary responses and heterogeneous treatment effects. The framework is based on three elements: a) Bayesian multivariate logistic regression analysis with a Pólya-Gamma expansion; b) a transformation procedure to transfer obtained regression coefficients to a more intuitive multivariate probability scale (i.e., success probabilities and the differences between them); and c) a compatible decision procedure for treatment comparison with prespecified decision error rates. Procedures for a priori sample size estimation under a non-informative prior distribution are included. A numerical evaluation demonstrated that decisions based on a priori sample size estimation resulted in anticipated error rates among the trial population as well as subpopulations. Further, average and conditional treatment effect parameters could be estimated unbiasedly when the sample was large enough. Illustration with the International Stroke Trial dataset revealed a trend towards heterogeneous effects among stroke patients: Something that would have remained undetected when analyses were limited to average treatment effects.
title Bayesian multivariate logistic regression for superiority and inferiority decision-making under observable treatment heterogeneity
topic Methodology
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2206.04133