Beyond Words: An Experimental Study of Signaling in Crowdfunding

Fuente: arXiv
Enregistré dans:
Détails bibliographiques
Auteurs principaux: Dambanemuya, Henry K., Choi, Eunseo, Gergle, Darren, Horvát, Emőke-Ágnes
Format: Preprint
Publié: 2022
Sujets:
Accès en ligne:
Tags: Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
_version_ 1866929206208757760
author Dambanemuya, Henry K.
Choi, Eunseo
Gergle, Darren
Horvát, Emőke-Ágnes
author_facet Dambanemuya, Henry K.
Choi, Eunseo
Gergle, Darren
Horvát, Emőke-Ágnes
contents Increasingly, crowdfunding is transforming financing for many people worldwide. Yet we know relatively little about how, why, and when funding outcomes are impacted by signaling between funders. We conduct two studies of N=500 and N=750 participants involved in crowdfunding to investigate the effect of certain characteristics of ``crowd signals'' on the decision to fund. We find that, under a variety of conditions, contributions of heterogeneous amounts arriving at varying time intervals are significantly more likely to be selected than homogeneous contribution amounts and times. The impact of signaling is strongest among participants who are susceptible to social influence. The effect is remarkably general across different project types, fundraising goals, participant interest in the projects, and participants' altruistic attitudes. Critically, the role of crowd signals in decision-making is typically unrecognized by participants. Our results underscore the fundamental nature of social signaling in crowdfunding, informing strategies for platforms, funders, and project creators.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2206_07210
institution arXiv
publishDate 2022
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Beyond Words: An Experimental Study of Signaling in Crowdfunding
Dambanemuya, Henry K.
Choi, Eunseo
Gergle, Darren
Horvát, Emőke-Ágnes
Human-Computer Interaction
J.4
Increasingly, crowdfunding is transforming financing for many people worldwide. Yet we know relatively little about how, why, and when funding outcomes are impacted by signaling between funders. We conduct two studies of N=500 and N=750 participants involved in crowdfunding to investigate the effect of certain characteristics of ``crowd signals'' on the decision to fund. We find that, under a variety of conditions, contributions of heterogeneous amounts arriving at varying time intervals are significantly more likely to be selected than homogeneous contribution amounts and times. The impact of signaling is strongest among participants who are susceptible to social influence. The effect is remarkably general across different project types, fundraising goals, participant interest in the projects, and participants' altruistic attitudes. Critically, the role of crowd signals in decision-making is typically unrecognized by participants. Our results underscore the fundamental nature of social signaling in crowdfunding, informing strategies for platforms, funders, and project creators.
title Beyond Words: An Experimental Study of Signaling in Crowdfunding
topic Human-Computer Interaction
J.4
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2206.07210