Cover Image

Comparison of metadata with relevance for bibliometrics between Microsoft Academic Graph and OpenAlex until 2020

Fuente: arXiv

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Scheidsteger, Thomas, Haunschild, Robin
Format:	Preprint
Published:	2022
Subjects:	Digital Libraries
Online Access:	Acceder al recurso
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Similar Items

Usage of OpenAlex for creating meaningful global overlay maps of science on the individual and institutional levels
by: Haunschild, Robin, et al.
Published: (2024)

An analysis of the suitability of OpenAlex for bibliometric analyses
by: Alperin, Juan Pablo, et al.
Published: (2024)

Mapping bibliographic metadata collections: the case of OpenCitations Meta and OpenAlex
by: Rizzetto, Elia, et al.
Published: (2023)

Coverage and metadata completeness and accuracy of African research publications in OpenAlex: A comparative analysis
by: Alonso-Alvarez, Patricia, et al.
Published: (2024)

Identification of young talented individuals in the natural and life sciences using bibliometric data
by: Bornmann, Lutz, et al.
Published: (2022)

(Non-)retracted academic papers in OpenAlex
by: Hauschke, Christian, et al.
Published: (2024)

Understanding discrepancies in the coverage of OpenAlex: the case of China
by: Zheng, Mengxue, et al.
Published: (2025)

Comparison of OpenAlex and Scopus coverage of German institutions' publications in top-tier journals
by: Lovakov, Andrey, et al.
Published: (2026)

Trends in Open Access Academic Outputs of State Agricultural Universities in India: Patterns from OpenAlex
by: Roy, Abhijit, et al.
Published: (2025)

Presenting a classifier to detect research contributions in OpenAlex
by: Haupka, Nick
Published: (2025)

The open access coverage of OpenAlex, Scopus and Web of Science
by: Simard, Marc-Andre, et al.
Published: (2024)

Geographical and Disciplinary Coverage of Open Access Journals: OpenAlex, Scopus and WoS
by: Maddi, Abdelghani, et al.
Published: (2024)

Reference Coverage Analysis of OpenAlex compared to Web of Science and Scopus
by: Culbert, Jack, et al.
Published: (2024)

One in Eight OpenAlex Abstracts Has Integrity Issues
by: Kim, Seorin, et al.
Published: (2026)

Is OpenAlex Suitable for Research Quality Evaluation and Which Citation Indicator is Best?
by: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Published: (2025)

Beyond openness: Inclusiveness and usability of Chinese scholarly data in OpenAlex
by: Zhang, Lin, et al.
Published: (2025)

Evaluating the Linguistic Coverage of OpenAlex: An Assessment of Metadata Accuracy and Completeness
by: Céspedes, Lucía, et al.
Published: (2024)

OpenAlex: Features, advantages and limitations of an open database for retrieving and analysing scholarly outputs
by: Borrego, Ángel, et al.
Published: (2025)

Analysis of the Publication and Document Types in OpenAlex, Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed and Semantic Scholar
by: Haupka, Nick, et al.
Published: (2024)

Paper self-citation: An unexplored phenomenon
by: Haunschild, Robin, et al.
Published: (2025)

Investigating Document Type, Language, Publication Year, and Author Count Discrepancies Between OpenAlex and Web of Science
by: Mongeon, Philippe, et al.
Published: (2025)

The 'Big Three' of Scientific Information: A comparative bibliometric review of Web of Science, Scopus, and OpenAlex
by: Torres-Salinas, Daniel, et al.
Published: (2026)

Acceso abierto en Argentina: una propuesta para el monitoreo de las publicaciones científicas con OpenAlex
by: Unzurrunzaga, Carolina, et al.
Published: (2024)

Academic match-makers in sociology: Their role in collaboration network formation
by: Chen, Hongkan, et al.
Published: (2026)

Revolutions in science: The proposal of an approach for the identification of most important researchers, institutions, and countries based on Reference Publication Year Spectroscopy (RPYS)
by: Bornmann, Lutz, et al.
Published: (2022)

OpenAlex2Pajek -- an R Package for converting OpenAlex bibliographic data into Pajek networks
by: Batagelj, Vladimir
Published: (2025)

Analysing the coverage of the University of Bologna's bibliographic and citation metadata in OpenCitations collections
by: Andreose, Erica, et al.
Published: (2025)

How permanent are metadata for research data? Understanding changes in DataCite metadata
by: Strecker, Dorothea
Published: (2024)

A pipeline for matching bibliographic references with incomplete metadata: experiments with Crossref and OpenCitations
by: Guenci, Matteo, et al.
Published: (2025)

Large language models for post-publication research evaluation: Evidence from expert recommendations and citation indicators
by: Wu, Mengjia, et al.
Published: (2026)

Improving metadata flows -- The simultaneous use of multiple metadata schemas at disciplinary research data repositories
by: Strecker, Dorothea
Published: (2026)

Scilit with the Integrated Impact Indicator Assessment
by: Dong, Haochen, et al.
Published: (2026)

Detection of metadata manipulations: Finding sneaked references in the scholarly literature
by: Besançon, Lonni, et al.
Published: (2025)

Perceptual and technical barriers in sharing and formatting metadata accompanying omics studies
by: Huang, Yu-Ning, et al.
Published: (2023)

Representing provenance and track changes of cultural heritage metadata in RDF: a survey of existing approaches
by: Massari, Arcangelo, et al.
Published: (2023)

Cost for research -- how cost data of research can be included in open metadata to be reused and evaluated
by: Bartlewski, Julia, et al.
Published: (2025)

Transparency to hybrid open access through publisher-provided metadata: An article-level study of Elsevier
by: Jahn, Najko, et al.
Published: (2021)

Multilingual research dissemination: Current practices and implications for bibliometrics
by: Santosa, Faizhal Arif, et al.
Published: (2025)

Data inaccuracy quantification and uncertainty propagation for bibliometric indicators
by: Donner, Paul
Published: (2023)

Impact of a reclassification of Web of Science articles on bibliometric indicators
by: Lahatte, Agénor, et al.
Published: (2024)