Illusory Attacks: Information-Theoretic Detectability Matters in Adversarial Attacks
Fuente:
arXiv
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2022
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866911867046199296 |
|---|---|
| author | Franzmeyer, Tim McAleer, Stephen Henriques, João F. Foerster, Jakob N. Torr, Philip H. S. Bibi, Adel de Witt, Christian Schroeder |
| author_facet | Franzmeyer, Tim McAleer, Stephen Henriques, João F. Foerster, Jakob N. Torr, Philip H. S. Bibi, Adel de Witt, Christian Schroeder |
| contents | Autonomous agents deployed in the real world need to be robust against adversarial attacks on sensory inputs. Robustifying agent policies requires anticipating the strongest attacks possible. We demonstrate that existing observation-space attacks on reinforcement learning agents have a common weakness: while effective, their lack of information-theoretic detectability constraints makes them detectable using automated means or human inspection. Detectability is undesirable to adversaries as it may trigger security escalations. We introduce ε-illusory, a novel form of adversarial attack on sequential decision-makers that is both effective and of ε-bounded statistical detectability. We propose a novel dual ascent algorithm to learn such attacks end-to-end. Compared to existing attacks, we empirically find ε-illusory to be significantly harder to detect with automated methods, and a small study with human participants (IRB approval under reference R84123/RE001) suggests they are similarly harder to detect for humans. Our findings suggest the need for better anomaly detectors, as well as effective hardware- and system-level defenses. The project website can be found at https://tinyurl.com/illusory-attacks. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2207_10170 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2022 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Illusory Attacks: Information-Theoretic Detectability Matters in Adversarial Attacks Franzmeyer, Tim McAleer, Stephen Henriques, João F. Foerster, Jakob N. Torr, Philip H. S. Bibi, Adel de Witt, Christian Schroeder Artificial Intelligence Autonomous agents deployed in the real world need to be robust against adversarial attacks on sensory inputs. Robustifying agent policies requires anticipating the strongest attacks possible. We demonstrate that existing observation-space attacks on reinforcement learning agents have a common weakness: while effective, their lack of information-theoretic detectability constraints makes them detectable using automated means or human inspection. Detectability is undesirable to adversaries as it may trigger security escalations. We introduce ε-illusory, a novel form of adversarial attack on sequential decision-makers that is both effective and of ε-bounded statistical detectability. We propose a novel dual ascent algorithm to learn such attacks end-to-end. Compared to existing attacks, we empirically find ε-illusory to be significantly harder to detect with automated methods, and a small study with human participants (IRB approval under reference R84123/RE001) suggests they are similarly harder to detect for humans. Our findings suggest the need for better anomaly detectors, as well as effective hardware- and system-level defenses. The project website can be found at https://tinyurl.com/illusory-attacks. |
| title | Illusory Attacks: Information-Theoretic Detectability Matters in Adversarial Attacks |
| topic | Artificial Intelligence |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2207.10170 |