Salvato in:
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autori principali: Chang, Chih-Wei, Marants, Raanan, Gao, Yuan, Goette, Matthew, Scholey, Jessica E., Bradley, Jeffrey D., Liu, Tian, Zhou, Jun, Sudhyadhom, Atchar, Yang, Xiaofeng
Natura: Preprint
Pubblicazione: 2022
Soggetti:
Accesso online:https://arxiv.org/abs/2207.13150
Tags: Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
_version_ 1866912438693134336
author Chang, Chih-Wei
Marants, Raanan
Gao, Yuan
Goette, Matthew
Scholey, Jessica E.
Bradley, Jeffrey D.
Liu, Tian
Zhou, Jun
Sudhyadhom, Atchar
Yang, Xiaofeng
author_facet Chang, Chih-Wei
Marants, Raanan
Gao, Yuan
Goette, Matthew
Scholey, Jessica E.
Bradley, Jeffrey D.
Liu, Tian
Zhou, Jun
Sudhyadhom, Atchar
Yang, Xiaofeng
contents Mapping computed tomography (CT) number to material property dominates the proton range uncertainty. This work aims to develop a physics-constrained deep learning-based multimodal imaging (PDMI) framework to integrate physics, deep learning, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and advanced dual-energy CT (DECT) to derive accurate patient mass density maps. Seven tissue substitute MRI phantoms were used for PDMI-based material calibration. The training inputs are from MRI and twin-beam dual-energy images acquired at 120 kVp with gold and tin filters. The feasibility investigation included an empirical DECT correlation and four residual networks (ResNet) derived from different training inputs and strategies by the PDMI framework. PRN-MR-DE and RN-MR-DE denote ResNet trained with and without a physics constraint using MRI and DECT images. PRN-DE and RN-DE represent ResNet trained with and without a physics constraint using DECT-only images. For the tissue surrogate study, PRN-MR-DE, PRN-DE, and RN-MR-DE result in mean mass density errors: -0.72%, 2.62%, -3.58% for adipose; -0.03%, -0.61%, and -0.18% for muscle; -0.58%, -1.36%, and -4.86% for 45% HA bone. The retrospective patient study indicated that PRN-MR-DE predicted the densities of soft tissue and bone within expected intervals based on the literature survey, while PRN-DE generated large density deviations. The proposed PDMI framework can generate accurate mass density maps using MRI and DECT images. The physics-constrained training can further enhance model efficacy, making PRN-MR-DE outperform RN-MR-DE. The patient investigation also shows that the PDMI framework has the potential to improve proton range uncertainty with accurate patient mass density maps.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2207_13150
institution arXiv
publishDate 2022
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Multimodal Imaging-based Material Mass Density Estimation for Proton Therapy Using Physics-Constrained Deep Learning
Chang, Chih-Wei
Marants, Raanan
Gao, Yuan
Goette, Matthew
Scholey, Jessica E.
Bradley, Jeffrey D.
Liu, Tian
Zhou, Jun
Sudhyadhom, Atchar
Yang, Xiaofeng
Medical Physics
Mapping computed tomography (CT) number to material property dominates the proton range uncertainty. This work aims to develop a physics-constrained deep learning-based multimodal imaging (PDMI) framework to integrate physics, deep learning, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and advanced dual-energy CT (DECT) to derive accurate patient mass density maps. Seven tissue substitute MRI phantoms were used for PDMI-based material calibration. The training inputs are from MRI and twin-beam dual-energy images acquired at 120 kVp with gold and tin filters. The feasibility investigation included an empirical DECT correlation and four residual networks (ResNet) derived from different training inputs and strategies by the PDMI framework. PRN-MR-DE and RN-MR-DE denote ResNet trained with and without a physics constraint using MRI and DECT images. PRN-DE and RN-DE represent ResNet trained with and without a physics constraint using DECT-only images. For the tissue surrogate study, PRN-MR-DE, PRN-DE, and RN-MR-DE result in mean mass density errors: -0.72%, 2.62%, -3.58% for adipose; -0.03%, -0.61%, and -0.18% for muscle; -0.58%, -1.36%, and -4.86% for 45% HA bone. The retrospective patient study indicated that PRN-MR-DE predicted the densities of soft tissue and bone within expected intervals based on the literature survey, while PRN-DE generated large density deviations. The proposed PDMI framework can generate accurate mass density maps using MRI and DECT images. The physics-constrained training can further enhance model efficacy, making PRN-MR-DE outperform RN-MR-DE. The patient investigation also shows that the PDMI framework has the potential to improve proton range uncertainty with accurate patient mass density maps.
title Multimodal Imaging-based Material Mass Density Estimation for Proton Therapy Using Physics-Constrained Deep Learning
topic Medical Physics
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2207.13150