On the self-consistency of DFT-1/2
Fuente:
arXiv
Salvato in:
| Autori principali: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Natura: | Preprint |
| Pubblicazione: |
2022
|
| Soggetti: | |
| Accesso online: | |
| Tags: |
Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
|
| _version_ | 1866910604749438976 |
|---|---|
| author | Cui, Hanli Yang, Shengxin Xue, Kan-Hao Huang, Jinhai Miao, Xiangshui |
| author_facet | Cui, Hanli Yang, Shengxin Xue, Kan-Hao Huang, Jinhai Miao, Xiangshui |
| contents | DFT-1/2 is an efficient band gap rectification method for density functional theory (DFT) under local density approximation (LDA) or generalized gradient approximation. It was suggested that non-self-consistent DFT-1/2 should be used for highly ionic insulators like LiF, while self-consistent DFT-1/2 should still be used for other compounds. Nevertheless, there is no quantitative criterion prescribed for which implementation should work for an arbitrary insulator, which leads to severe ambiguity in this method. In this work we analyze the impact of self-consistency in DFT-1/2 and shell DFT-1/2 calculations in insulators or semiconductors with ionic bonds, covalent bonds and intermediate cases, and show that self-consistency is required even for highly ionic insulators for globally better electronic structure details. The self-energy correction renders electrons more localized around the anions in self-consistent LDA-1/2. The well-known delocalization error of LDA is rectified, but with strong overcorrection due to the presence of additional self-energy potential. However, in non-self-consistent LDA-1/2 calculations, the electron wavefunctions indicate that such localization is much more severe and beyond a reasonable range, because the strong Coulomb repulsion is not counted in the Hamiltonian. Another common drawback of non-self-consistent LDA-1/2 lies in that the ionicity of the bonding gets substantially enhanced, and the band gap can be enormously high in mixed ionic-covalent compounds like $\mathrm{TiO_2}$. The impact of LDA-1/2-induced stress is also discussed comprehensively. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2209_01636 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2022 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | On the self-consistency of DFT-1/2 Cui, Hanli Yang, Shengxin Xue, Kan-Hao Huang, Jinhai Miao, Xiangshui Materials Science Computational Physics DFT-1/2 is an efficient band gap rectification method for density functional theory (DFT) under local density approximation (LDA) or generalized gradient approximation. It was suggested that non-self-consistent DFT-1/2 should be used for highly ionic insulators like LiF, while self-consistent DFT-1/2 should still be used for other compounds. Nevertheless, there is no quantitative criterion prescribed for which implementation should work for an arbitrary insulator, which leads to severe ambiguity in this method. In this work we analyze the impact of self-consistency in DFT-1/2 and shell DFT-1/2 calculations in insulators or semiconductors with ionic bonds, covalent bonds and intermediate cases, and show that self-consistency is required even for highly ionic insulators for globally better electronic structure details. The self-energy correction renders electrons more localized around the anions in self-consistent LDA-1/2. The well-known delocalization error of LDA is rectified, but with strong overcorrection due to the presence of additional self-energy potential. However, in non-self-consistent LDA-1/2 calculations, the electron wavefunctions indicate that such localization is much more severe and beyond a reasonable range, because the strong Coulomb repulsion is not counted in the Hamiltonian. Another common drawback of non-self-consistent LDA-1/2 lies in that the ionicity of the bonding gets substantially enhanced, and the band gap can be enormously high in mixed ionic-covalent compounds like $\mathrm{TiO_2}$. The impact of LDA-1/2-induced stress is also discussed comprehensively. |
| title | On the self-consistency of DFT-1/2 |
| topic | Materials Science Computational Physics |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2209.01636 |