$2$-polarity and algorithmic aspects of polarity variants on cograph superclasses

Fuente: arXiv
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Contreras-Mendoza, Fernando Esteban, Hernández-Cruz, César
Format: Preprint
Published: 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866929541766709248
author Contreras-Mendoza, Fernando Esteban
Hernández-Cruz, César
author_facet Contreras-Mendoza, Fernando Esteban
Hernández-Cruz, César
contents A graph $G$ is said to be an $(s, k)$-polar graph if its vertex set admits a partition $(A, B)$ such that $A$ and $B$ induce, respectively, a complete $s$-partite graph and the disjoint union of at most $k$ complete graphs. Polar graphs and monopolar graphs are defined as $(\infty, \infty)$- and $(1, \infty)$-polar graphs, respectively, and unipolar graphs are those graphs with a polar partition $(A, B)$ such that $A$ is a clique. The problems of deciding whether an arbitrary graph is a polar graph or a monopolar graph are known to be NP-complete. In contrast, deciding whether a graph is a unipolar graph can be done in polynomial time. In this work we prove that the three previous problems can be solved in linear time on the classes of $P_4$-sparse and $P_4$-extendible graphs, generalizing analogous results previously known for cographs. Additionally, we provide finite forbidden subgraph characterizations for $(2,2)$-polar graphs on $P_4$-sparse and $P_4$-extendible graphs, also generalizing analogous results recently obtained for the class of cographs.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2210_02497
institution arXiv
publishDate 2022
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle $2$-polarity and algorithmic aspects of polarity variants on cograph superclasses
Contreras-Mendoza, Fernando Esteban
Hernández-Cruz, César
Combinatorics
05C75, 05C15, 05C85, 68R10
A graph $G$ is said to be an $(s, k)$-polar graph if its vertex set admits a partition $(A, B)$ such that $A$ and $B$ induce, respectively, a complete $s$-partite graph and the disjoint union of at most $k$ complete graphs. Polar graphs and monopolar graphs are defined as $(\infty, \infty)$- and $(1, \infty)$-polar graphs, respectively, and unipolar graphs are those graphs with a polar partition $(A, B)$ such that $A$ is a clique. The problems of deciding whether an arbitrary graph is a polar graph or a monopolar graph are known to be NP-complete. In contrast, deciding whether a graph is a unipolar graph can be done in polynomial time. In this work we prove that the three previous problems can be solved in linear time on the classes of $P_4$-sparse and $P_4$-extendible graphs, generalizing analogous results previously known for cographs. Additionally, we provide finite forbidden subgraph characterizations for $(2,2)$-polar graphs on $P_4$-sparse and $P_4$-extendible graphs, also generalizing analogous results recently obtained for the class of cographs.
title $2$-polarity and algorithmic aspects of polarity variants on cograph superclasses
topic Combinatorics
05C75, 05C15, 05C85, 68R10
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.02497