PoliGraph: Automated Privacy Policy Analysis using Knowledge Graphs (Journal Version)
Fuente:
arXiv
Salvato in:
| Autori principali: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Natura: | Preprint |
| Pubblicazione: |
2022
|
| Soggetti: | |
| Accesso online: | |
| Tags: |
Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
|
| _version_ | 1866909525750054912 |
|---|---|
| author | Cui, Hao Trimananda, Rahmadi Jordan, Scott Markopoulou, Athina |
| author_facet | Cui, Hao Trimananda, Rahmadi Jordan, Scott Markopoulou, Athina |
| contents | Privacy policies disclose how an organization collects and handles personal information. Recent work has made progress in leveraging natural language processing (NLP) to automate privacy policy analysis and extract data collection statements from different sentences, considered in isolation from each other. In this paper, we view and analyze, for the first time, the entire text of a privacy policy in an integrated way. In terms of methodology: (1) we define PoliGraph, a type of knowledge graph that captures statements in a policy as relations between different parts of the text; and (2) we revisit the notion of ontologies, previously defined in heuristic ways, to capture subsumption relations between terms. We make a clear distinction between local and global ontologies to capture the context of individual policies, application domains, and privacy laws. We develop PoliGrapher, an NLP tool to automatically extract PoliGraph from the text using linguistic analysis. Using a public dataset for evaluation, we show that PoliGrapher identifies 40% more collection statements than prior state-of-the-art, with 97% precision. In terms of applications, PoliGraph enables automated analysis of a corpus of policies and allows us to: (1) reveal common patterns in the texts across different policies, and (2) assess the correctness of the terms as defined within a policy. We also apply PoliGraph to: (3) detect contradictions in a policy, where we show false alarms by prior work, and (4) analyze the consistency of policies and network traffic, where we identify significantly more clear disclosures than prior work. Finally, leveraging the capabilities of the emerging large language models (LLMs), we also present PoliGrapher-LM, a tool that uses LLM prompting instead of NLP linguistic analysis, to extract PoliGraph from the policy text, and we show that it further improves coverage. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2210_06746 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2022 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | PoliGraph: Automated Privacy Policy Analysis using Knowledge Graphs (Journal Version) Cui, Hao Trimananda, Rahmadi Jordan, Scott Markopoulou, Athina Cryptography and Security Privacy policies disclose how an organization collects and handles personal information. Recent work has made progress in leveraging natural language processing (NLP) to automate privacy policy analysis and extract data collection statements from different sentences, considered in isolation from each other. In this paper, we view and analyze, for the first time, the entire text of a privacy policy in an integrated way. In terms of methodology: (1) we define PoliGraph, a type of knowledge graph that captures statements in a policy as relations between different parts of the text; and (2) we revisit the notion of ontologies, previously defined in heuristic ways, to capture subsumption relations between terms. We make a clear distinction between local and global ontologies to capture the context of individual policies, application domains, and privacy laws. We develop PoliGrapher, an NLP tool to automatically extract PoliGraph from the text using linguistic analysis. Using a public dataset for evaluation, we show that PoliGrapher identifies 40% more collection statements than prior state-of-the-art, with 97% precision. In terms of applications, PoliGraph enables automated analysis of a corpus of policies and allows us to: (1) reveal common patterns in the texts across different policies, and (2) assess the correctness of the terms as defined within a policy. We also apply PoliGraph to: (3) detect contradictions in a policy, where we show false alarms by prior work, and (4) analyze the consistency of policies and network traffic, where we identify significantly more clear disclosures than prior work. Finally, leveraging the capabilities of the emerging large language models (LLMs), we also present PoliGrapher-LM, a tool that uses LLM prompting instead of NLP linguistic analysis, to extract PoliGraph from the policy text, and we show that it further improves coverage. |
| title | PoliGraph: Automated Privacy Policy Analysis using Knowledge Graphs (Journal Version) |
| topic | Cryptography and Security |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.06746 |