Enregistré dans:
Détails bibliographiques
Auteurs principaux: Suffian, Muhammad, Khan, Muhammad Yaseen, Bogliolo, Alessandro
Format: Preprint
Publié: 2022
Sujets:
Accès en ligne:https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.00103
Tags: Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
_version_ 1866917601933787136
author Suffian, Muhammad
Khan, Muhammad Yaseen
Bogliolo, Alessandro
author_facet Suffian, Muhammad
Khan, Muhammad Yaseen
Bogliolo, Alessandro
contents Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) has recently gained a swell of interest, as many Artificial Intelligence (AI) practitioners and developers are compelled to rationalize how such AI-based systems work. Decades back, most XAI systems were developed as knowledge-based or expert systems. These systems assumed reasoning for the technical description of an explanation, with little regard for the user's cognitive capabilities. The emphasis of XAI research appears to have turned to a more pragmatic explanation approach for better understanding. An extensive area where cognitive science research may substantially influence XAI advancements is evaluating user knowledge and feedback, which are essential for XAI system evaluation. To this end, we propose a framework to experiment with generating and evaluating the explanations on the grounds of different cognitive levels of understanding. In this regard, we adopt Bloom's taxonomy, a widely accepted model for assessing the user's cognitive capability. We utilize the counterfactual explanations as an explanation-providing medium encompassed with user feedback to validate the levels of understanding about the explanation at each cognitive level and improvise the explanation generation methods accordingly.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2211_00103
institution arXiv
publishDate 2022
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Towards Human Cognition Level-based Experiment Design for Counterfactual Explanations (XAI)
Suffian, Muhammad
Khan, Muhammad Yaseen
Bogliolo, Alessandro
Artificial Intelligence
Human-Computer Interaction
68T01, 68T20
K.3.2
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) has recently gained a swell of interest, as many Artificial Intelligence (AI) practitioners and developers are compelled to rationalize how such AI-based systems work. Decades back, most XAI systems were developed as knowledge-based or expert systems. These systems assumed reasoning for the technical description of an explanation, with little regard for the user's cognitive capabilities. The emphasis of XAI research appears to have turned to a more pragmatic explanation approach for better understanding. An extensive area where cognitive science research may substantially influence XAI advancements is evaluating user knowledge and feedback, which are essential for XAI system evaluation. To this end, we propose a framework to experiment with generating and evaluating the explanations on the grounds of different cognitive levels of understanding. In this regard, we adopt Bloom's taxonomy, a widely accepted model for assessing the user's cognitive capability. We utilize the counterfactual explanations as an explanation-providing medium encompassed with user feedback to validate the levels of understanding about the explanation at each cognitive level and improvise the explanation generation methods accordingly.
title Towards Human Cognition Level-based Experiment Design for Counterfactual Explanations (XAI)
topic Artificial Intelligence
Human-Computer Interaction
68T01, 68T20
K.3.2
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.00103