How to Tell When a Result Will Replicate: Significance and Replication in Distributional Null Hypothesis Tests

Fuente: arXiv
Enregistré dans:
Détails bibliographiques
Auteurs principaux: Costello, Fintan, Watts, Paul
Format: Preprint
Publié: 2022
Sujets:
Accès en ligne:
Tags: Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
_version_ 1866910814954323968
author Costello, Fintan
Watts, Paul
author_facet Costello, Fintan
Watts, Paul
contents There is a well-known problem in Null Hypothesis Significance Testing: many statistically significant results fail to replicate in subsequent experiments. We show that this problem arises because standard `point-form null' significance tests consider only within-experiment but ignore between-experiment variation, and so systematically underestimate the degree of random variation in results. We give an extension to standard significance testing that addresses this problem by analysing both within- and between-experiment variation. This `distributional null' approach does not underestimate experimental variability and so is not overconfident in identifying significance; because this approach addresses between-experiment variation, it gives mathematically coherent estimates for the probability of replication of significant results. Using a large-scale replication dataset (the first `Many Labs' project), we show that many experimental results that appear statistically significant in standard tests are in fact consistent with random variation when both within- and between-experiment variation are taken into account in this approach. Further, grouping experiments in this dataset into `predictor-target' pairs we show that the predicted replication probabilities for target experiments produced in this approach (given predictor experiment results and the sample sizes of the two experiments) are strongly correlated with observed replication rates. Distributional null hypothesis testing thus gives researchers a statistical tool for identifying statistically significant and reliably replicable results.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2211_02609
institution arXiv
publishDate 2022
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle How to Tell When a Result Will Replicate: Significance and Replication in Distributional Null Hypothesis Tests
Costello, Fintan
Watts, Paul
Methodology
Statistics Theory
There is a well-known problem in Null Hypothesis Significance Testing: many statistically significant results fail to replicate in subsequent experiments. We show that this problem arises because standard `point-form null' significance tests consider only within-experiment but ignore between-experiment variation, and so systematically underestimate the degree of random variation in results. We give an extension to standard significance testing that addresses this problem by analysing both within- and between-experiment variation. This `distributional null' approach does not underestimate experimental variability and so is not overconfident in identifying significance; because this approach addresses between-experiment variation, it gives mathematically coherent estimates for the probability of replication of significant results. Using a large-scale replication dataset (the first `Many Labs' project), we show that many experimental results that appear statistically significant in standard tests are in fact consistent with random variation when both within- and between-experiment variation are taken into account in this approach. Further, grouping experiments in this dataset into `predictor-target' pairs we show that the predicted replication probabilities for target experiments produced in this approach (given predictor experiment results and the sample sizes of the two experiments) are strongly correlated with observed replication rates. Distributional null hypothesis testing thus gives researchers a statistical tool for identifying statistically significant and reliably replicable results.
title How to Tell When a Result Will Replicate: Significance and Replication in Distributional Null Hypothesis Tests
topic Methodology
Statistics Theory
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.02609