Salvato in:
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autori principali: Lu, Xinhang, Peters, Jannik, Aziz, Haris, Bei, Xiaohui, Suksompong, Warut
Natura: Preprint
Pubblicazione: 2022
Soggetti:
Accesso online:https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.12647
Tags: Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
_version_ 1866913540984537088
author Lu, Xinhang
Peters, Jannik
Aziz, Haris
Bei, Xiaohui
Suksompong, Warut
author_facet Lu, Xinhang
Peters, Jannik
Aziz, Haris
Bei, Xiaohui
Suksompong, Warut
contents We consider a voting scenario in which the resource to be voted upon may consist of both indivisible and divisible goods. This setting generalizes both the well-studied model of multiwinner voting and the recently introduced model of cake sharing. Under approval votes, we propose two variants of the extended justified representation (EJR) notion from multiwinner voting, a stronger one called EJR for mixed goods (EJR-M) and a weaker one called EJR up to 1 (EJR-1). We extend three multiwinner voting rules to our setting -- GreedyEJR, the method of equal shares (MES), and proportional approval voting (PAV) -- and show that while all three generalizations satisfy EJR-1, only the first one provides EJR-M. In addition, we derive tight bounds on the proportionality degree implied by EJR-M and EJR-1, and investigate the proportionality degree of our proposed rules.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2211_12647
institution arXiv
publishDate 2022
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Approval-Based Voting with Mixed Goods
Lu, Xinhang
Peters, Jannik
Aziz, Haris
Bei, Xiaohui
Suksompong, Warut
Computer Science and Game Theory
We consider a voting scenario in which the resource to be voted upon may consist of both indivisible and divisible goods. This setting generalizes both the well-studied model of multiwinner voting and the recently introduced model of cake sharing. Under approval votes, we propose two variants of the extended justified representation (EJR) notion from multiwinner voting, a stronger one called EJR for mixed goods (EJR-M) and a weaker one called EJR up to 1 (EJR-1). We extend three multiwinner voting rules to our setting -- GreedyEJR, the method of equal shares (MES), and proportional approval voting (PAV) -- and show that while all three generalizations satisfy EJR-1, only the first one provides EJR-M. In addition, we derive tight bounds on the proportionality degree implied by EJR-M and EJR-1, and investigate the proportionality degree of our proposed rules.
title Approval-Based Voting with Mixed Goods
topic Computer Science and Game Theory
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.12647