Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2022
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.14831 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866916156069117952 |
|---|---|
| author | Peirelinck, Thijs Hermans, Chris Spiessens, Fred Deconinck, Geert |
| author_facet | Peirelinck, Thijs Hermans, Chris Spiessens, Fred Deconinck, Geert |
| contents | Residential demand response programs aim to activate demand flexibility at the household level. In recent years, reinforcement learning (RL) has gained significant attention for these type of applications. A major challenge of RL algorithms is data efficiency. New RL algorithms, such as proximal policy optimisation (PPO), have tried to increase data efficiency. Additionally, combining RL with transfer learning has been proposed in an effort to mitigate this challenge. In this work, we further improve upon state-of-the-art transfer learning performance by incorporating demand response domain knowledge into the learning pipeline. We evaluate our approach on a demand response use case where peak shaving and self-consumption is incentivised by means of a capacity tariff. We show our adapted version of PPO, combined with transfer learning, reduces cost by 14.51% compared to a regular hysteresis controller and by 6.68% compared to traditional PPO. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2211_14831 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2022 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Combined Peak Reduction and Self-Consumption Using Proximal Policy Optimization Peirelinck, Thijs Hermans, Chris Spiessens, Fred Deconinck, Geert Systems and Control Machine Learning Residential demand response programs aim to activate demand flexibility at the household level. In recent years, reinforcement learning (RL) has gained significant attention for these type of applications. A major challenge of RL algorithms is data efficiency. New RL algorithms, such as proximal policy optimisation (PPO), have tried to increase data efficiency. Additionally, combining RL with transfer learning has been proposed in an effort to mitigate this challenge. In this work, we further improve upon state-of-the-art transfer learning performance by incorporating demand response domain knowledge into the learning pipeline. We evaluate our approach on a demand response use case where peak shaving and self-consumption is incentivised by means of a capacity tariff. We show our adapted version of PPO, combined with transfer learning, reduces cost by 14.51% compared to a regular hysteresis controller and by 6.68% compared to traditional PPO. |
| title | Combined Peak Reduction and Self-Consumption Using Proximal Policy Optimization |
| topic | Systems and Control Machine Learning |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.14831 |