Buchumschlag

Which international co-authorships produce higher quality journal articles?

Fuente: arXiv

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser:	Thelwall, Mike, Kousha, Kayvan, Abdoli, Mahshid, Stuart, Emma, Makita, Meiko, Wilson, Paul, Levitt, Jonathan
Format:	Preprint
Veröffentlicht:	2022
Schlagworte:	Digital Libraries
Online-Zugang:	Acceder al recurso
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

Ähnliche Einträge

Which international co‐authorships produce higher quality journal articles?
von: Mike Thelwall, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2024)

Which stylistic features fool ChatGPT research evaluations?
von: Kousha, Kayvan, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2026)

Have LLM-associated terms increased in article full texts in all fields?
von: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2026)

Journal Quality Factors from ChatGPT: More meaningful than Impact Factors?
von: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2024)

How much are LLMs changing the language of academic papers after ChatGPT? A multi-database and full text analysis
von: Kousha, Kayvan, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2025)

Assessing the societal influence of academic research with ChatGPT: Impact case study evaluations
von: Kousha, Kayvan, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2024)

Can ChatGPT evaluate research environments? Evidence from REF2021
von: Kousha, Kayvan, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2025)

In which fields can ChatGPT detect journal article quality? An evaluation of REF2021 results
von: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2024)

Do Large Language Models know Which Published Articles have been Retracted?
von: Thelwall, Mike
Veröffentlicht: (2026)

Is OpenAlex Suitable for Research Quality Evaluation and Which Citation Indicator is Best?
von: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2025)

In which fields do ChatGPT scores align better than citations with research quality?
von: Thelwall, Mike
Veröffentlicht: (2025)

Research quality evaluation by AI in the era of Large Language Models: Advantages, disadvantages, and systemic effects
von: Thelwall, Mike
Veröffentlicht: (2025)

Can ChatGPT evaluate research quality?
von: Thelwall, Mike
Veröffentlicht: (2024)

Quantitative Methods in Research Evaluation Citation Indicators, Altmetrics, and Artificial Intelligence
von: Thelwall, Mike
Veröffentlicht: (2024)

Prompt perturbation and fraction facilitation sometimes strengthen Large Language Model scores
von: Thelwall, Mike
Veröffentlicht: (2025)

Estimating the quality of academic books from their descriptions with ChatGPT
von: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2025)

Do male leading authors retract more articles than female leading authors?
von: Zheng, Er-Te, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2025)

Will AI be overconfident about academic research findings when reliant on abstracts? (v1)
von: Thelwall, Mike
Veröffentlicht: (2026)

Evaluating Research Quality with Large Language Models: An Analysis of ChatGPT's Effectiveness with Different Settings and Inputs
von: Thelwall, Mike
Veröffentlicht: (2024)

Can Smaller Large Language Models Evaluate Research Quality?
von: Thelwall, Mike
Veröffentlicht: (2025)

Designing large language model prompts to extract scores from messy text: A shared dataset and challenge
von: Thelwall, Mike
Veröffentlicht: (2026)

Can ChatGPT be a good follower of academic paradigms? Research quality evaluations in conflicting areas of sociology
von: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2025)

A Global South Strategy for Evaluating Research Value with ChatGPT
von: Nunkoo, Robin, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2025)

Research evaluation with ChatGPT: Is it age, country, length, or field biased?
von: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2024)

Implicit and Explicit Research Quality Score Probabilities from ChatGPT
von: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2025)

Can Large Language Models Evaluate Grant Proposal Quality? Revisiting the Wennerås and Wold Peer Review Data
von: Sandström, Ulf, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2026)

Can Small and Reasoning Large Language Models Score Journal Articles for Research Quality and Do Averaging and Few-shot Help?
von: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2025)

Evaluating the Predictive Capacity of ChatGPT for Academic Peer Review Outcomes Across Multiple Platforms
von: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2024)

Evaluating the quality of published medical research with ChatGPT
von: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2024)

Distinguishing articles in questionable and non-questionable journals using quantitative indicators associated with quality
von: Stephen, Dimity
Veröffentlicht: (2024)

Assessing the societal influence of academic research with ChatGPT: Impact case study evaluations
von: Kayvan Kousha, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2025)

Science discussions of retracted articles on Bluesky: public scrutiny or misinformation spreading?
von: Zheng, Er-Te, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2026)

Large Language Models for Departmental Expert Review Quality Scores
von: Langfeldt, Liv, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2026)

Funding, authorship patterns and citation impact of articles funded by Ukrainian agencies before and during Russia's full-scale war (2020-2023)
von: Hladchenko, Myroslava, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2025)

Can news and social media attention reduce the influence of problematic research?
von: Zheng, Er-Te, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2025)

Academic Co-authorship is a Risky Game
von: Lazebnik, Teddy, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2022)

How is science discussed on Bluesky?
von: Zheng, Er-Te, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2025)

Graph Analysis of Citation and Co-authorship Networks of Egyptian Authors
von: Ayman, Mariam, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2024)

Fine-grained classification of journal articles by relying on multiple layers of information through similarity network fusion: the case of the Cambridge Journal of Economics
von: Baccini, Alberto, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2023)

Shifting norms in scholarly publications: trends in readability, objectivity, authorship, and AI use
von: Cunningham, Padraig, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2025)