Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2022
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.07861 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866929529632587776 |
|---|---|
| author | Xia, Yan Gronow, Antti Malkamäki, Arttu Ylä-Anttila, Tuomas Keller, Barbara Kivelä, Mikko |
| author_facet | Xia, Yan Gronow, Antti Malkamäki, Arttu Ylä-Anttila, Tuomas Keller, Barbara Kivelä, Mikko |
| contents | The Russian invasion of Ukraine in 2022 dramatically reshaped the European security landscape. In Finland, public opinion on NATO had long been polarized along the left-right partisan axis, but the invasion led to a rapid convergence of the opinion toward joining NATO. We investigate whether and how this depolarization took place among polarized actors on Finnish Twitter. By analyzing retweeting patterns, we find three separated user groups before the invasion: a pro-NATO, a left-wing anti-NATO, and a conspiracy-charged anti-NATO group. After the invasion, the left-wing anti-NATO group members broke out of their retweeting bubble and connected with the pro-NATO group despite their difference in partisanship, while the conspiracy-charged anti-NATO group mostly remained a separate cluster. Our content analysis reveals that the left-wing anti-NATO group and the pro-NATO group were bridged by a shared condemnation of Russia's actions and shared democratic norms, while the other anti-NATO group, mainly built around conspiracy theories and disinformation, consistently demonstrated a clear anti-NATO attitude. We show that an external threat can bridge partisan divides in issues linked to the threat, but bubbles upheld by conspiracy theories and disinformation may persist even under dramatic external threats. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2212_07861 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2022 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | The Russian invasion of Ukraine selectively depolarized the Finnish NATO discussion Xia, Yan Gronow, Antti Malkamäki, Arttu Ylä-Anttila, Tuomas Keller, Barbara Kivelä, Mikko Social and Information Networks The Russian invasion of Ukraine in 2022 dramatically reshaped the European security landscape. In Finland, public opinion on NATO had long been polarized along the left-right partisan axis, but the invasion led to a rapid convergence of the opinion toward joining NATO. We investigate whether and how this depolarization took place among polarized actors on Finnish Twitter. By analyzing retweeting patterns, we find three separated user groups before the invasion: a pro-NATO, a left-wing anti-NATO, and a conspiracy-charged anti-NATO group. After the invasion, the left-wing anti-NATO group members broke out of their retweeting bubble and connected with the pro-NATO group despite their difference in partisanship, while the conspiracy-charged anti-NATO group mostly remained a separate cluster. Our content analysis reveals that the left-wing anti-NATO group and the pro-NATO group were bridged by a shared condemnation of Russia's actions and shared democratic norms, while the other anti-NATO group, mainly built around conspiracy theories and disinformation, consistently demonstrated a clear anti-NATO attitude. We show that an external threat can bridge partisan divides in issues linked to the threat, but bubbles upheld by conspiracy theories and disinformation may persist even under dramatic external threats. |
| title | The Russian invasion of Ukraine selectively depolarized the Finnish NATO discussion |
| topic | Social and Information Networks |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.07861 |