Salvato in:
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autori principali: Bommasani, Rishi, Liang, Percy
Natura: Preprint
Pubblicazione: 2022
Soggetti:
Accesso online:https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.11672
Tags: Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
_version_ 1866911958901456896
author Bommasani, Rishi
Liang, Percy
author_facet Bommasani, Rishi
Liang, Percy
contents How do we design measures of social bias that we trust? While prior work has introduced several measures, no measure has gained widespread trust: instead, mounting evidence argues we should distrust these measures. In this work, we design bias measures that warrant trust based on the cross-disciplinary theory of measurement modeling. To combat the frequently fuzzy treatment of social bias in NLP, we explicitly define social bias, grounded in principles drawn from social science research. We operationalize our definition by proposing a general bias measurement framework DivDist, which we use to instantiate 5 concrete bias measures. To validate our measures, we propose a rigorous testing protocol with 8 testing criteria (e.g. predictive validity: do measures predict biases in US employment?). Through our testing, we demonstrate considerable evidence to trust our measures, showing they overcome conceptual, technical, and empirical deficiencies present in prior measures.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2212_11672
institution arXiv
publishDate 2022
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Trustworthy Social Bias Measurement
Bommasani, Rishi
Liang, Percy
Computation and Language
How do we design measures of social bias that we trust? While prior work has introduced several measures, no measure has gained widespread trust: instead, mounting evidence argues we should distrust these measures. In this work, we design bias measures that warrant trust based on the cross-disciplinary theory of measurement modeling. To combat the frequently fuzzy treatment of social bias in NLP, we explicitly define social bias, grounded in principles drawn from social science research. We operationalize our definition by proposing a general bias measurement framework DivDist, which we use to instantiate 5 concrete bias measures. To validate our measures, we propose a rigorous testing protocol with 8 testing criteria (e.g. predictive validity: do measures predict biases in US employment?). Through our testing, we demonstrate considerable evidence to trust our measures, showing they overcome conceptual, technical, and empirical deficiencies present in prior measures.
title Trustworthy Social Bias Measurement
topic Computation and Language
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.11672