Unconditional Quantum Advantage for Sampling with Shallow Circuits
Fuente:
arXiv
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Preprint |
| Publicado: |
2023
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| _version_ | 1866916161710456832 |
|---|---|
| author | Watts, Adam Bene Parham, Natalie |
| author_facet | Watts, Adam Bene Parham, Natalie |
| contents | Recent work by Bravyi, Gosset, and Koenig showed that there exists a search problem that a constant-depth quantum circuit can solve, but that any constant-depth classical circuit with bounded fan-in cannot. They also pose the question: Can we achieve a similar proof of separation for an input-independent sampling task? In this paper, we show that the answer to this question is yes when the number of random input bits given to the classical circuit is bounded.
We introduce a distribution $D_{n}$ over $\{0,1\}^n$ and construct a constant-depth uniform quantum circuit family $\{C_n\}_n$ such that $C_n$ samples from a distribution close to $D_{n}$ in total variation distance. For any $δ< 1$ we also prove, unconditionally, that any classical circuit with bounded fan-in gates that takes as input $kn + n^δ$ i.i.d. Bernouli random variables with entropy $1/k$ and produces output close to $D_{n}$ in total variation distance has depth $Ω(\log \log n)$. This gives an unconditional proof that constant-depth quantum circuits can sample from distributions that can't be reproduced by constant-depth bounded fan-in classical circuits, even up to additive error. We also show a similar separation between constant-depth quantum circuits with advice and classical circuits with bounded fan-in and fan-out, but access to an unbounded number of i.i.d random inputs.
The distribution $D_n$ and classical circuit lower bounds are inspired by work of Viola, in which he shows a different (but related) distribution cannot be sampled from approximately by constant-depth bounded fan-in classical circuits. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2301_00995 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2023 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Unconditional Quantum Advantage for Sampling with Shallow Circuits Watts, Adam Bene Parham, Natalie Quantum Physics Computational Complexity Recent work by Bravyi, Gosset, and Koenig showed that there exists a search problem that a constant-depth quantum circuit can solve, but that any constant-depth classical circuit with bounded fan-in cannot. They also pose the question: Can we achieve a similar proof of separation for an input-independent sampling task? In this paper, we show that the answer to this question is yes when the number of random input bits given to the classical circuit is bounded. We introduce a distribution $D_{n}$ over $\{0,1\}^n$ and construct a constant-depth uniform quantum circuit family $\{C_n\}_n$ such that $C_n$ samples from a distribution close to $D_{n}$ in total variation distance. For any $δ< 1$ we also prove, unconditionally, that any classical circuit with bounded fan-in gates that takes as input $kn + n^δ$ i.i.d. Bernouli random variables with entropy $1/k$ and produces output close to $D_{n}$ in total variation distance has depth $Ω(\log \log n)$. This gives an unconditional proof that constant-depth quantum circuits can sample from distributions that can't be reproduced by constant-depth bounded fan-in classical circuits, even up to additive error. We also show a similar separation between constant-depth quantum circuits with advice and classical circuits with bounded fan-in and fan-out, but access to an unbounded number of i.i.d random inputs. The distribution $D_n$ and classical circuit lower bounds are inspired by work of Viola, in which he shows a different (but related) distribution cannot be sampled from approximately by constant-depth bounded fan-in classical circuits. |
| title | Unconditional Quantum Advantage for Sampling with Shallow Circuits |
| topic | Quantum Physics Computational Complexity |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.00995 |