Minding rights: Mapping ethical and legal foundations of 'neurorights'
Fuente:
arXiv
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2023
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866917028324966400 |
|---|---|
| author | Ligthart, Sjors Ienca, Marcello Meynen, Gerben Molnar-Gabor, Fruzsina Andorno, Roberto Bublitz, Christoph Catley, Paul Claydon, Lisa Douglas, Thomas Farahany, Nita Fins, Joseph J. Goering, Sara Haselager, Pim Jotterand, Fabrice Lavazza, Andrea McCay, Allan Paz, Abel Wajnerman Rainey, Stephen Ryberg, Jesper Kellmeyer, Philipp |
| author_facet | Ligthart, Sjors Ienca, Marcello Meynen, Gerben Molnar-Gabor, Fruzsina Andorno, Roberto Bublitz, Christoph Catley, Paul Claydon, Lisa Douglas, Thomas Farahany, Nita Fins, Joseph J. Goering, Sara Haselager, Pim Jotterand, Fabrice Lavazza, Andrea McCay, Allan Paz, Abel Wajnerman Rainey, Stephen Ryberg, Jesper Kellmeyer, Philipp |
| contents | The rise of neurotechnologies, especially in combination with AI-based methods for brain data analytics, has given rise to concerns around the protection of mental privacy, mental integrity and cognitive liberty - often framed as 'neurorights' in ethical, legal and policy discussions. Several states are now looking at including 'neurorights' into their constitutional legal frameworks and international institutions and organizations, such as UNESCO and the Council of Europe, are taking an active interest in developing international policy and governance guidelines on this issue. However, in many discussions of 'neurorights' the philosophical assumptions, ethical frames of reference and legal interpretation are either not made explicit or are in conflict with each other. The aim of this multidisciplinary work here is to provide conceptual, ethical and legal foundations that allow for facilitating a common minimalist conceptual understanding of mental privacy, mental integrity and cognitive liberty to facilitate scholarly, legal and policy discussions. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2302_06281 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2023 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Minding rights: Mapping ethical and legal foundations of 'neurorights' Ligthart, Sjors Ienca, Marcello Meynen, Gerben Molnar-Gabor, Fruzsina Andorno, Roberto Bublitz, Christoph Catley, Paul Claydon, Lisa Douglas, Thomas Farahany, Nita Fins, Joseph J. Goering, Sara Haselager, Pim Jotterand, Fabrice Lavazza, Andrea McCay, Allan Paz, Abel Wajnerman Rainey, Stephen Ryberg, Jesper Kellmeyer, Philipp Neurons and Cognition Computers and Society The rise of neurotechnologies, especially in combination with AI-based methods for brain data analytics, has given rise to concerns around the protection of mental privacy, mental integrity and cognitive liberty - often framed as 'neurorights' in ethical, legal and policy discussions. Several states are now looking at including 'neurorights' into their constitutional legal frameworks and international institutions and organizations, such as UNESCO and the Council of Europe, are taking an active interest in developing international policy and governance guidelines on this issue. However, in many discussions of 'neurorights' the philosophical assumptions, ethical frames of reference and legal interpretation are either not made explicit or are in conflict with each other. The aim of this multidisciplinary work here is to provide conceptual, ethical and legal foundations that allow for facilitating a common minimalist conceptual understanding of mental privacy, mental integrity and cognitive liberty to facilitate scholarly, legal and policy discussions. |
| title | Minding rights: Mapping ethical and legal foundations of 'neurorights' |
| topic | Neurons and Cognition Computers and Society |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.06281 |