Regret-Based Defense in Adversarial Reinforcement Learning

Fuente: arXiv
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Belaire, Roman, Varakantham, Pradeep, Nguyen, Thanh, Lo, David
Format: Preprint
Published: 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866911815029489664
author Belaire, Roman
Varakantham, Pradeep
Nguyen, Thanh
Lo, David
author_facet Belaire, Roman
Varakantham, Pradeep
Nguyen, Thanh
Lo, David
contents Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) policies have been shown to be vulnerable to small adversarial noise in observations. Such adversarial noise can have disastrous consequences in safety-critical environments. For instance, a self-driving car receiving adversarially perturbed sensory observations about nearby signs (e.g., a stop sign physically altered to be perceived as a speed limit sign) or objects (e.g., cars altered to be recognized as trees) can be fatal. Existing approaches for making RL algorithms robust to an observation-perturbing adversary have focused on reactive approaches that iteratively improve against adversarial examples generated at each iteration. While such approaches have been shown to provide improvements over regular RL methods, they are reactive and can fare significantly worse if certain categories of adversarial examples are not generated during training. To that end, we pursue a more proactive approach that relies on directly optimizing a well-studied robustness measure, regret instead of expected value. We provide a principled approach that minimizes maximum regret over a "neighborhood" of observations to the received "observation". Our regret criterion can be used to modify existing value- and policy-based Deep RL methods. We demonstrate that our approaches provide a significant improvement in performance across a wide variety of benchmarks against leading approaches for robust Deep RL.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2302_06912
institution arXiv
publishDate 2023
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Regret-Based Defense in Adversarial Reinforcement Learning
Belaire, Roman
Varakantham, Pradeep
Nguyen, Thanh
Lo, David
Machine Learning
Artificial Intelligence
Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) policies have been shown to be vulnerable to small adversarial noise in observations. Such adversarial noise can have disastrous consequences in safety-critical environments. For instance, a self-driving car receiving adversarially perturbed sensory observations about nearby signs (e.g., a stop sign physically altered to be perceived as a speed limit sign) or objects (e.g., cars altered to be recognized as trees) can be fatal. Existing approaches for making RL algorithms robust to an observation-perturbing adversary have focused on reactive approaches that iteratively improve against adversarial examples generated at each iteration. While such approaches have been shown to provide improvements over regular RL methods, they are reactive and can fare significantly worse if certain categories of adversarial examples are not generated during training. To that end, we pursue a more proactive approach that relies on directly optimizing a well-studied robustness measure, regret instead of expected value. We provide a principled approach that minimizes maximum regret over a "neighborhood" of observations to the received "observation". Our regret criterion can be used to modify existing value- and policy-based Deep RL methods. We demonstrate that our approaches provide a significant improvement in performance across a wide variety of benchmarks against leading approaches for robust Deep RL.
title Regret-Based Defense in Adversarial Reinforcement Learning
topic Machine Learning
Artificial Intelligence
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.06912