Performance comparison of the two reconstruction methods for stabilizer-based quantum secret sharing
Fuente:
arXiv
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Preprint |
| Publicado: |
2023
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| _version_ | 1866913824391561216 |
|---|---|
| author | Chiwaki, Shogo Matsumoto, Ryutaroh |
| author_facet | Chiwaki, Shogo Matsumoto, Ryutaroh |
| contents | Stabilizer-based quantum secret sharing has two methods to reconstruct a quantum secret: The erasure correcting procedure and the unitary procedure. It is known that the unitary procedure has a smaller circuit width. On the other hand, it is unknown which method has smaller depth and fewer circuit gates. In this paper, it is shown that the unitary procedure has smaller depth and fewer circuit gates when the circuits are designed for quantum secret sharing using $[[5, 1, 3]]$ binary stabilizer codes. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2302_08663 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2023 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Performance comparison of the two reconstruction methods for stabilizer-based quantum secret sharing Chiwaki, Shogo Matsumoto, Ryutaroh Quantum Physics Stabilizer-based quantum secret sharing has two methods to reconstruct a quantum secret: The erasure correcting procedure and the unitary procedure. It is known that the unitary procedure has a smaller circuit width. On the other hand, it is unknown which method has smaller depth and fewer circuit gates. In this paper, it is shown that the unitary procedure has smaller depth and fewer circuit gates when the circuits are designed for quantum secret sharing using $[[5, 1, 3]]$ binary stabilizer codes. |
| title | Performance comparison of the two reconstruction methods for stabilizer-based quantum secret sharing |
| topic | Quantum Physics |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.08663 |