Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2023
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.13920 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866909871654305792 |
|---|---|
| author | Sawyer, Eric T. |
| author_facet | Sawyer, Eric T. |
| contents | We give a slightly different proof of the NTV conjecture for the Hilbert transform that was proved by T. Hytönen, M. Lacey, E.T. Sawyer, C.-Y. Shen and I. Uriarte-Tuero, building on previous work of F. Nazarov, S. Treil and A. Volberg. After modifying the decomposition of the main bilinear form, we give a new proof of control of functional energy that is based on the potential Theorem 1 of [Saw3], rather than the Poisson Theorem 2 that is used in all other proofs in the literature. This approach was pioneered in the first version of Sawyer and Wick [SaWi] on the ArXiv. Then we alter the bottom-up corona construction, the size functional, the straddling lemmas, and the use of recursion of admissible collections of pairs of intervals, from M. Lacey [Lac]. However, the essence of control of the stopping form remains as in the fundamental work of Lacey. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2302_13920 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2023 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | A reprise of the NTV conjecture for the Hilbert transform Sawyer, Eric T. Classical Analysis and ODEs 42A50 We give a slightly different proof of the NTV conjecture for the Hilbert transform that was proved by T. Hytönen, M. Lacey, E.T. Sawyer, C.-Y. Shen and I. Uriarte-Tuero, building on previous work of F. Nazarov, S. Treil and A. Volberg. After modifying the decomposition of the main bilinear form, we give a new proof of control of functional energy that is based on the potential Theorem 1 of [Saw3], rather than the Poisson Theorem 2 that is used in all other proofs in the literature. This approach was pioneered in the first version of Sawyer and Wick [SaWi] on the ArXiv. Then we alter the bottom-up corona construction, the size functional, the straddling lemmas, and the use of recursion of admissible collections of pairs of intervals, from M. Lacey [Lac]. However, the essence of control of the stopping form remains as in the fundamental work of Lacey. |
| title | A reprise of the NTV conjecture for the Hilbert transform |
| topic | Classical Analysis and ODEs 42A50 |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.13920 |